Re: Ob: After delivery inspection/exploration

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Fri Jun 8 21:14:23 2007


Art:

What a wild study!

You are sooo very good in doing research and are a true resource for us all.

Sincere thanks.

Garry

At Fri, 8 Jun 2007, art fougner, md wrote: >
>OK this might be more than a little over the top ...
>
> JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):175-7.
> "Endoview" project of intrapartum endoscopy.
> Petrikovsky BM, Ravens S.
>
>Nassau University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and
>Gynecology, East Meadow, NY 11554, USA.
>
>INTRODUCTION: The change in obstetrical practices over the last decade
>in favor of trials of labor in patients with uterine scars has resulted
>in increased incidences of uterine ruptures. Although neither repeat
>cesarean delivery nor a trial of labor is risk free, evidence from a
>large multicenter study shows vaginal birth after the cesarean (VBAC) is
>associated with shorter hospital stays, fewer postpartum blood
>transfusions, and a decreased incidence of postpartum maternal fever.
>The uterine rupture remains the most serious complication associated
>with VBAC. Factors associated with uterine rupture include excessive
>exposure to oxytocin, dysfunctional labor, and a history of more than 1
>cesarean delivery.2 Because uterine rupture may be a life-threatening
>event, intrapartum surveillance and the ability to perform an emergency
>surgery are both necessary when trial of labor is allowed. Until now,
>no early symptoms pathognomonic to uterine rupture had been described.
>We share our experiences with the novel approach to the problem - an
>intrapartum endoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endoscopic examination
>was accomplished by using the intraoperational fiberscope (Olympus and
>Endoview system (Costa Mesa, CA, USA). A gas-sterilized 25-cm long
>fiberscope is introduced into the amniotic cavity through the cervical
>canal after rupture of the membranes. The distance between the
>fiberscope and the object varies from 3 to 50 mm. The fiberscope has a
>separate channel for the fluid infusion (normal saline) throughout the
>procedure; the surgeon looks through the eyepiece directly and exhibits
>control over the flexible scope. The duration of endoscopy is less than
>15 minutes. The inserting of the endoscopic device is very similar to
>that of insertion of an intrauterine pressure catheter. The IRB
>Committees of both participating institutions approved the study
>protocol. Twenty-eight patients with an unknown or poorly documented
>site of the uterine scar were included in the study. An ultrasound
>examination had been performed on all patients prior to endoscopy to
>assess fetal wellbeing and placental location. The ages of the patients
>ranged from 21 to 38 years. Eighteen women had 1 previous cesarean
>delivery, and 10 had 2. The performance of intrapartum endoscopy did
>not interfere with fetal monitoring; 21 fetuses were monitored
>externally, 7 internally. Indications for previous cesarean deliveries
>were as follows: fetal distress in 11 cases, failure to progress in
>labor in 8, placenta previa in 2, and unknown in 7. Twenty-one patients
>delivered vaginally; 7 had had repeat cesarean deliveries. All neonates
>were born in satisfactory condition. The Apgar scores at 1 minute
>varied from 7 to 9 and at 5 minutes from 8 to 10. The integrity of the
>uterine wall was assessed by manual postpartum uterine exploration in
>each case of vaginal delivery and by visualization and palpation of the
>scar site in each abdominal delivery. RESULTS: The lower uterine
>segment and contractile portion of the anterior uterine wall were
>visualized successfully in all patients. In 25 patients, the presumed
>scar site looked totally indistinguishable from the rest of the lower
>uterine segment and anterior uterine wall. Two scars were identified as
>vertical in 2 patients who were delivered by a repeat abdominal
>operation. A vertical scar appears as a groove running in a
>cephalad-caudad direction from the lower uterine segment into the
>contractile portion of the anterior uterine wall. The usefulness of the
>intrapartum endoscopy is best demonstrated by the following case reports
>(2 of 28 study cases).
>
>Art
>
>At Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote:
>>
>>I can't imagine that there is any evidence for it, and the evidence
>>against it probably doesn't exist, either. Art is right (or
>>somebody)--this is the art of medicine.
>>
>>The numbers of missed lacerations due to a lack of inspection, or
>>"found" ones are probably so small that a huge study would have to be
>>undertaken to prove any evidence of a significant difference.
>>
>>I can certainly understand that a uterine exploration is not done
>>commonly, but not inspecting the sidewalls and cervix (which takes
>>moments and is easy and can be done quickly, even if there is no
>>anesthesia) seems foolish to me, FWIW.
>>
>>Garry
>>
>>At Fri, 8 Jun 2007, ainsron wrote:
>>>
>>>I agree
>>>
>>>Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of FRANCES
>>>WREN
>>>Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 1:18 AM
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>>Subject: Re: Ob: After delivery inspection/exploration
>>>
>>>my assessment after delivery
>>>SVD...with no problems....a quick look,congratulations and a smile.
>>>forceps..I look at vagina...up to area of cervix....I do not routinely
>>>explore round the cervix ,unless it seems to be bleeding excessively.
>>>epis...I check to make sure I have got the "top"...I do not check the rectum
>>>unless i have real reason to believe I have got any sutures into there.
>>>if a 4th degree...hopefully not ..i may check in the rectum after repairing
>>>the epis.
>>>VBAC..i do not routinely explore , unless it has been a dicey one (that I
>>>wish I had C/S.)..or if there is excess bleeding.
>>>
>>>i am inclined to be a "let sleeping dogs lie...unless thy look like they may
>>>be snarly ones"
>>>

>>>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: garrys@mindspring.com (Garry E. Siegel, M.D.)
>>>Date: Thursday, June 7, 2007 8:54 pm
>>>Subject: Ob: After delivery inspection/exploration
>>>
>>>> Listers:
>>>>
>>>> What do you routinely assess after delivery?
>>>>
>>>> Does your routine vary by what was done (SVD, Forceps, epis, no epis,
>>>> VBAC, etc.)?
>>>>
>>>> Garry
>>>>
>>>> FWIW:
>>>>
>>>> I explore the uterus if possible; always visualize the sidewalls
>>>> and do
>>>> a rectal exam, and, duh, look at the perineum, labia and periurethral
>>>> areas.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>>> Private Practice
>>>> Roswell, GA
>>>>
>>--
>>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>>Private Practice
>>Roswell, GA
>>
>--
>art fougner, md
>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:56:52 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.