-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Progestasert From: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net) Thu Jun 7 17:49:51 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Marie Harkins: "Re: Ob: PP hemorrhage in a VBAC--why do we VBAC, anyway :)?" Previous message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Progestasert" In reply to: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Progestasert" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: Progestasert" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Popeil Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Raymond Stephen Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:35 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Progestasert Who is Ron Popeil and what is the Pearl Index of a "Showtime Grill"? Steve -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of art fougner, md Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Progestasert The Mirena appears to be the greatest invention since Ron Popeil's Showtime Grill. Just my opinion. I could be wrong. Art At Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Raymond Stephen wrote: > > In the course of preparing a talk on contraception for GPs I realised >that the old IUCD Progestasert was the fore-runner of the Mirena by many >years, but as I never used a Progestasert and don't know anything about >the comparative merits of it versus the Mirena I wondered if anyone had >experience that would show any differences and, if any, were they >significant? >Anyone out there got any thoughts on Progestasert and why it seems to >have been superseded by Mirena? > >Steve > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. Next message: Marie Harkins: "Re: Ob: PP hemorrhage in a VBAC--why do we VBAC, anyway :)?" Previous message: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Progestasert" In reply to: Raymond Stephen: "Re: Progestasert" Next in thread: Charlie Chambers: "Re: Progestasert"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:53:44 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.