Re: Severe PIH 34 weeks

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Thu May 24 10:21:45 2007


Since Redman and Bonnar in 1976 demonstrated a relationship between risk of perinatal mortality and uric acid level, a uric acid of 4 mg % is reassuring as far as the perinate is concerned.

Art

At Thu, 24 May 2007, Andrew Folley wrote: >
>Good point. Creatinine 0.5 uric acid 4 LFTs all normal platelets
>300,000.
>
>>From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md)
>>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>Subject: Re: Severe PIH 34 weeks
>>Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 05:45:46 -0500
>>
>>Just curious - what is the blood uric acid level?
>>
>>Art
>>
>>At Wed, 23 May 2007, Andrew Folley wrote:
>> >
>> >Have to respectfully disagree with you in spite of your gray hair. I am
>>not
>> >aware that PIH is the same animal as preeclampsia and is treated the
>>same.
>> >We still have to "practice" medicine and work within the guidelines of
>> >medical knowledge and not do a knee jerk reaction and say "get her
>> >delivered" to every problem making it an NICU problem and not an OB
>>problem.
>> >Agreed BP 170/110 is a medical emergency and needs to be treated quickly.
>> >Treatment does not necessarily warrant delivery. Show me the literature
>>to
>> >support delivery. I still have not seen a reason why the baby at 33w 5d
>>is
>> >better off in the NICU than in the mother. Moms BP is controlled with
>> >labetalol and procardia at this time.
>> >
>> >>From: "R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com>
>> >>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>> >>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>> >>Subject: Re: Severe PIH 34 weeks
>> >>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:53:38 -0500
>> >>
>> >>You got enough Gray hair on this list telling you to deliver that you
>>don't
>> >>need to worry about all that other stuff.
>> >>Myself, Joe C, Joe P, Art, Bob, et al.
>> >>
>> >>BTW BP 110 diastolic is a medical emergency in any patient, pregnant or
>> >>not,
>> >>PIH or not, Toxemia or not, Essential Hypertension or not. It needs to
>>be
>> >>lowered right away to prevent blowing out a vessel in the Squash. PIH is
>> >>just a variant of toxemia and should be treated the same. IMHO.
>> >>
>> >>Dan
>> >>
>> >>On 5/23/07, DoctorJoe@aol.com <DoctorJoe@aol.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> In a message dated 5/23/2007 1:08:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>> >>>AllanHo@aol.com writes:
>> >>>
>> >>>The flip side of this argument is that if you deliver the baby, say by
>> >>>c/s, and the mother died from a PE. Now the burden of proof would be
>>on
>> >>>why
>> >>>the baby had to be delivered so urgently... Because you "think"
>>something
>> >>>bad is going to happen?
>> >>>
>> >>> No, you document what you did and why you did what you did.
>> >>>
>> >>>In this case, a "well grown" baby implies, at least to me, the
>> >>>hypertension is due to preeclampsia. The treatment is delivery. We
>>don't
>> >>>"think" the treatment is delivery -- it is obstetric dogma that the
>> >>>treatment is delivery.
>> >>>
>> >>>If, for the sake of argument, we posit that the HBP is due to chronic
>> >>>hypertension, then that carries a WORSE prognosis as far as abruption
>>and
>> >>>sudden fetal death, since there is chronic small vessel disease, yada,
>> >>>yada,
>> >>>yada. (It doesn't look like that here, since there is no IUGR, oligo,
>> >>>etc.,
>> >>>but for the sake of argument ... .) So we don't "think" she needs to
>>be
>> >>>delivered, we know that the stats on severe hypertensives in pregnancy
>>are
>> >>>bad and there is a higher chance of something bad happening from the
>>HBP
>> >>>than, say, a PE postoperatively.
>> >>>
>> >>>All of that goes on the chart, is discussed with the patient, and you
>>do a
>> >>>C/S. If you do it NOW, you'll likely have less maternal morbidity than
>>if
>> >>>you let her "declare" herself.
>> >>>
>> >>>Joe P.
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>>See what's free at AOL.com
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>><http://www.aol.com/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503>.
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>--
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG(L) CMT
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>Professor Emeritus
>> >>> ------------------------------
>> >>Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>> >>Indiana U. School of Medicine
>> >>
>> >>R. Daniel Braun
>> >>
>> >> "The way to health is an aromatic bath and scented massage
>> >>everyday".
>> >> Hippocrates
>>
>>--
>>art fougner, md
>>"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now.
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>It’s free. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGHM_MAY07
>_________________________________________________________________
>

--
art fougner, md
"May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:52:46 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.