Re: opinions, please

From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com)
Mon May 14 18:28:12 2007


Agree with Steve on this. Send both tubes together. Sending separatgely results in two separate charges.

>From: "Raymond Stephen" <stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: RE: opinions, please
>Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:12:23 -0500
>
>It has always mystified me why people mark the tube segments or send
>them separately to the lab. What difference is it going to make if one
>of the segments is not tube in the final analysis? You are still going
>to have to go back and deal with the missed one and I can't imagine that
>it is not going to be obvious when you get there which one needs
>attention. The tubes have been together all the years prior to the
>surgery, so why separate them?
>
>Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr
>Eberhard Lisse
>Sent: Sunday, 13 May 2007 4:31 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: opinions, please
>
>why does one do the histology in the first place? To prove it is
>done. To the patient (and her lawyers) as much as to the Medical Aid
>funds.
>
>It depends a little on which hospital I operate in that day, but
>usually the operating theatre staff send one container only, because I
>mark the right specimen. One of the Pathologists was an intern of
>mine many years ago, the other one I have been sending these specimens
>to for over 15 years, so they know: "one specimen, marked with a
>suture, presumed to be the right tube, will be examined as tissue
>block II". On the few occasions where they only received one
>specimen, they always immediately phoned me, and started a major
>search, which was successful each time, unless I wrote on the form:
>"previous salpingectomy noted, only one, the right/left specimen sent"
>and they then comment on this in the report. (I still mark the right
>one even if it is the only one :-)-O)
>
>el
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
>
>The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected
>by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or
>persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are
>warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is
>unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please
>immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of
>the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the
>transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any
>unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the
>transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in
>relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the
>matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it
>by any other person or for any other purpose.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:42 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.