Re: MRI for patients at risk for breast cancer

From: Joanne Bulley, MD (islesannie@gmail.com)
Tue Apr 3 20:36:10 2007


But the MRI of Breast also misses DCIS - so as we all know - nothing is the end-all / perfect test.

There are false positives and false negatives with any of the breast screening programs.

So ... for the super dense breasts and for the significant family history - I often send the patient to one of the local general surgeons and ask for the development of a screening plan for this patient - that is specific to her risk factors. If I actually order the MRM - it is witih a second opinion / review by a gen surg!

With all the other stuff I make sure the patients know and get screened for in the office - this is one I am more than happy to assign to the general surgeon for detailed review of pertinent history and development of plan!

Joanne maybe I am just a chicken on this subject!

At Tue, 3 Apr 2007, ainsron wrote: >
>This is what I found in the recently published ACS guidelines:
>
>The new guidelines from the American Cancer Society[2] were prompted by
>several recent studies of MRI screening of women at high risk of breast
>cancer. While these studies found that the addition of MRI to mammography
>increased the frequency of false-positive test results compared to
>mammography alone, it also produced important improvements in breast cancer
>detection.
>
>Based on these findings, the American Cancer Society recommends yearly
>screening with breast MRI in addition to mammography for the following
>high-risk groups of women:
>
>Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
>Women who have a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, child) with a BRCA1
>or BRCA2 mutation, even if they have yet to be tested themselves
>Women who have a 20-25% or greater risk of breast cancer based on risk
>assessment tools
>Women who had radiation to the chest between the ages of 10 and 30 years
>Women who have Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Cowden syndrome, or
>Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome, or may have one of these syndromes based
>on a history in a first-degree relative
>
>Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Garry E.
>Siegel, M.D.
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:13 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Gyn: MRI for patients at risk for breast cancer
>
>Regarding the recently published article about this, a reference is made
>to a BRCAPRO model, which I assume is somewhat like the Gail Model.
>
>The Gail Model is available in many places; how does one use this
>model/obtain it/etc.? Or, do I refer patients out for this assessment?
>
>Any help is welcome; I am googling and not getting anywhere fast.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Garry
>
>--
>Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
>Private Practice
>Roswell, GA
>

--
Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG
Solo gyn
Keene, NH USA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:56:19 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.