![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: lost IUDFrom: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C. (johnprov@sympatico.ca)Tue Mar 27 14:40:47 2007
At Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Gold, Ingrid wrote: > >I have been told by a Mirena rep that the PID risk is actually less than with no IUD, as a result of the mucous plug formed in the cervix and its role in preventing ascending infection. > >Ingrid Gold, CNM, Phoenix > The same rep probably also used to say the risk of perforation is 1 10,000; well the risk is the same as T and copperT; also some studies show that the inflamatory response after perforation is the same. The risk with PID is related to the number of sexual partners, nuligravids are more likely not to be married and more likely to have more than one partner if the mirena is in uteru for five years. With a 50% divorce rate one can make a strong arguement Married multips are likely to have more than one partner in five years. There are lies dam lies and then there are statistics.
--
Take care, John
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:14 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.