Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue

From: Charlie Chambers (ricechaz@earthlink.net)
Wed Mar 14 22:07:54 2007


Hey, they managed to pull this off in Minnesota.

On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:58 PM, Joanne Bulley, MD wrote:

> The link a posted did not come through correctly - at least for me
> viewing the list messages at teh web site.
>
> I did a little looking and this is the link:
>
> http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-
> ctdoctax0307.artmar07,0,1237386.story
>
> The docs who took the time plead the Physician side quite well.
>
> I liked the one analgoy:
> "Taxing doctors for doing our work makes no more sense than taxing
> teachers to fund public education, taxing firemen for fighting
> fires or
> taxing policemen or lawyers or pharmacist or anyone else for what they
> do," Gourlie said. "Taxing doctors to fund health care for the
> underserved is not the solution, and it will result in less care for
> everybody."
>
> And so we watch things unroll (or unravel?). Most MDs have always
> thought o fbeing there in the office taking care of hte PATIENT
> first -
> so we have through the years shrugged our shoulders and put up with
> the
> various hassles.
>
> I have been in practice since 1985. It is getting harder to stay with
> it ... but I have not yet taken any time to consider what else I
> would
> do if I quit.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Joanne
>
> At Wed, 14 Mar 2007, rmodugno@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: GIN11153@aol.com
>> To: ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net
>> Sent: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 1:00 AM
>> Subject: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue
>>
>> Â Connecticut state lawmakers are considering a 3% tax on
>> physicians' revenues to help pay for a statewide $900 million
>> universal
>> healthcare plan, according to the Hartford Courant.
>>
>> More than a dozen healthcare providers traveled to the capitol to
>> oppose the proposal in March. Physicians told lawmakers that the tax
>> would likely drive physicians out of the Medicaid system and reduce
>> patient access to healthcare.Â
>>
>> Read the rest here:
>>
>> http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-
>> ctdoctax0307.artmar07,0,1237386.story?coll=hc-headlines-politics-
>> state
>>
>> Gail
>> **************
>>
>

> --
> Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG
> Solo gyn
> Keene, NH USA

************************************************************************ **** Charlie Chambers Hood River, OR cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world" -- Mahatma Ghandi. ************************************************************************ *******





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:09:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.