-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue From: Joanne Bulley, MD (islesannie@gmail.com) Wed Mar 14 19:22:01 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" In reply to: Meenan, Anna: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Reply: Henry Gregor: "Basic levels" Reply: art fougner, md: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Hey - I like that one. Tax the plastic and the esthetic / cosmetic / laser stuff that folks will shell out fresh hard cash for. But they balk at paying their $15 co-pay at time of visit to us! Tax the luxury vanity items so that there is a basic level of care available to all. Joanne At Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Meenan, Anna wrote: > >Hey, I propose we tax elective plastic surgery in California. We >could probably finance an entire National Health Insurance plan with >just that move alone. > >Anna L. Meenan, MD, FAAFP > >>.plans such as the Connecticutt proposal were probably predictable >>once Arrhhnold brought out his plans for universal coverage in >>California earlier this year, which also featured a similar >>financing angle. >> >>H >> >>Hank >> >>Don't get soaked. Take a< >>http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/?fr=oni_on_mail%E0%A7%AD> >>quick peek at the forecast >>with the< >>http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/?fr=oni_on_mail%E0%A7%AD>Yahoo! >>Search weather shortcut. -- Joanne Bulley, MD, FACOG Solo gyn Keene, NH USA Next message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" In reply to: Meenan, Anna: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue" Reply: Henry Gregor: "Basic levels" Reply: art fougner, md: "Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:09:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.