Re: Connecticut considers 3% tax on physician revenue

From: DoctorJoe@aol.com
Wed Mar 14 06:38:18 2007


In a message dated 3/14/07 12:00:43 AM, GIN11153@aol.com writes:

> In addition to taxing healthcare providers, lawmakers are seeking to raise
> taxes on cigarettes and initiating a new vanity tax on elective cosmetic
> surgery to fund the proposal. Proponents say the tax on doctors' revenues will
> generate $600 million for the state and will be offset by an anticipated $300
> million in federal reimbursement. In an attempt to soften the blow, the plan
> also calls for increasing Medicaid reimbursements to physicians by 30%, at a
> cost to the state of $500 million.
>

I don't know. Something about "robbing Peter to pay Paul" sort of rings in my head, but I can't quite put my finger on it. Of course, I don't live in Connecticut, so I really don't care. hehe

Joe P.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:09:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.