-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient From: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net) Sun Mar 11 10:22:31 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: US health care system" Previous message: D. Ashley Hill: "Re: US health care system" In reply to: Jamie: "Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient" Next in thread: Doc Peró: "Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient" I think it is more that the distinction is useless. If you have mild disease, it is a red-flag, get the patient delivered before it becomes severe or eclampsia. Some things you just are or aren't, the in between ground makes no difference, it's like being a little pregnant. Ronald E. Ainsworth, MD, FACOG -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 7:33 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient Maybe moderate preeclampsia is a retrospective diagnosis? At Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Efrain Ramirez wrote: > >appropriate indeed - page 569 - same table - same author? .. 21st >edition.. > >Interesting - next page - "Importantly, the differentiation between mild >and sevre can be misleading because apparently mild disease can progress >rapidly to severe disease." ...blood pressure is not always a dependeble >indicator of its severity".... > >Ef > >At Sat, 10 Mar 2007, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: >> >>In a message dated 3/10/07 1:18:32 PM, eramirezt@coqui.net writes: >> >>> This Practice Bulletin was developed by the ACOG Committee on Practice >>rap III, >>> MD, and Susan M.  Ramin, MD.  >>> >>Thus, it probably IS germaine to refer to the latest edition of Williams. >>Right? >> >>Joe P. >> >>e >>... entire body." >> >>-- >> >-- >“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance, >it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian > -- JFields, RN, BSN Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: US health care system" Previous message: D. Ashley Hill: "Re: US health care system" In reply to: Jamie: "Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient" Next in thread: Doc Peró: "Re: Dr. Siegel re: pre eclamptic patient"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:13 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.