![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: A Vaccine to Save Women's LivesFrom: Raymond Stephen (stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au)Wed Feb 7 15:12:28 2007
There have been several decades of experience with "benefits that can be duplicated without the risk", and the number of deaths from Ca Cervix has fallen only slightly. I think it is time to stop pretending that "behaviour choice affords the same protection", because behaviour choice has been shown to be only so-so. While I agree that the vaccine should be given only to those who agree, the opt-out approach is the most democratic way of achieving the public health benefits that can come from this. Steve -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 4:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: A Vaccine to Save Womens Lives Why should anyone have to jump through bureaucratic hoops to protect their children from a potentially risky vaccine with benefits that can be duplicated without the risk?
At Tue, 6 Feb 2007, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
>
-- JFields, RN, BSN
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:46:00 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.