Re: A Vaccine to Save Womens Lives
From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Tue Feb 6 20:18:39 2007
My objection to mandatory vaccination is the lack of ample information -
should have nothing to do with religion..IMHO...not to start a flame.
Ef
>At Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Andrew Folley wrote:
>
>Mandating vaccines for infectious diseases that can run rampant through an
>institution is one thing.
>Mumps measels rubella, polio etc. menigococcal for college kids etc.
>HPV is somewhat different in that the person has to choose to engage in the
>high risk behavior.
>Everyone in the class may have HPV but my daughter will not get it if she
>refrains from sexual activity until marriage and marrries a Christian man
>who has abstained from sexual activity. andrew
>
>>From: Joe Cutchin <forcep@intercom.net>
>>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>Subject: Re: A Vaccine to Save Women’s Lives
>>Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:43:17 -0600
>>
>>Maryland now requires varicella and meningococcal for entry to public
>>school. Lets see , 1984 was when? I am for outlawing death. Joe C
>>
>>DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
>>>In a message dated 2/6/2007 8:24:50 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>>>ajfields@pine-net.com writes:
>>>
>>> A lot of parents, myself included (though I'm not in Texas) object to
>>> their daughters being forced to take a new vaccine when a behavior
>>> choice affords the same protection.
>>>
>>>Well, if the Amish, e.g., can refuse MMR, why can't the rest refuse
>>>Gardasil?
>>> Joe P.
>>>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Valentine’s Day -- Shop for gifts that spell L-O-V-E at MSN Shopping
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8323,ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24095&tcode=wlmtagline
>_________________________________________________________________
>
--
“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
