Re: Instrument for the Infundibulo-pelvic ligaments

From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com)
Tue Feb 6 07:01:01 2007


I have been using the Gyrus followed by endoloop tie. agf

>From: rmodugno@aol.com
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: Instrument for the Infundibulo-pelvic ligaments
>Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 21:52:06 -0600
>
>Surveying the cyber-gyns:
>
>Which, in your experience, is the safest instrument to take the
>infundibulo-pelvic ligament in laparoscopic hysterectomy?
>By safest, I mean the instrument which most consistently takes this pedicle
>without having to go back to deal with bleeding.
>In my experience it has been the seitzenger-type coagulator/cutter - Gyrus
>also manufactures one.
>
>Agree? disagree?
>Prefer the harmonic scalpel? Staples? Other?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>Sylva, NC
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sat Aug 2 04:52:04 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.