Re: Ob:  Preterm labor

From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Thu Feb 1 10:47:55 2007


Ditto..

Ef

At Wed, 31 Jan 2007, zygote@icsi.net wrote: >
>AMEN to the MAN! RJC
>
>> In a message dated 1/29/2007 8:20:54 A.M. Central Standard Time, rkaplan@triad.rr.com writes:
>> I am a believer in evidenced based medicine and I believe that "preterm
>labor" is > overdiagnosed and overtreated. Having said that, Iexpect that we
>all have had that one > patient with a 3 cm/effaced cervix, 0 station, who with
>hospitalization and/or terb. pump > managed to carry the pregnancy to 36
>weeks and delivered as soon as she got up and > about or as soon as the
>pump was stopped. I guess I'm trying to say that just because it is > hard to
>prove thattocolysis "works" statistically, that doesn't mean that itmight still be >
>beneficial in some select cases.
>>
>> From the Man! On 29 Jan 2007 at 9:48, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Exactly. The main problem is, IMHO, the studies of preterm labor and
>tocolysishave to be > rigorously designed to exclude (as best as can be done, at
>least) those false positive cases so as > not to be studying overdiagnosed
>illness (i.e. NON illness). So if you look at the definition of > "preterm labor" in
>most published studies, the patients included are often too far along in labor for
>> anything to work very well anyway. I think all seasoned obstetricians would
>grant you that a patient > in established labor at 4-5cm is NOT going to respond
>to tocolytic therapy. But you can't take > people with a soft, 1cm cervix and
>contractions as part of the study, or you'll be overdiagnosing
>> and overtreating, as you say. So the studies in the published literature (which
>show no benefit) are > designed such that they WON'T show any benefit.
>>
>> So in day to day practice,you're left with treating people earlier in the process,
>hoping that your > overtreatment of some people doesn't cause more
>trouble/expense than the benefit of catching > those people that it helps.
>>
>> I guess this is a kind of medical macro application of the Heisenberg
>Uncertainty Principle. I think > it applies to cerclage, as well. But that's another
>story for another day, althoughit may well be > related.
>>
>> Joe P.
>>
>> "Chuck Norris is the reason why Waldo is hiding."
>>
>Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD
>6624 Fannin, #2720
>Houston, TX 77030
>(O) 713-795-4600
>(F) 713-795-4422
>
>"Life is difficult"
>The Road Less Travelled
>by Scott Peck

--
“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:55:46 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.