![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: hysteroscopic sterilizationFrom: Glazerman, Larry MD (GlazerL@slhn.org)Wed Jan 31 12:55:12 2007
I've done about 100 cases of ESSURE. The advantages to the patient are no general anesthesia, and no incisions. More than 90% of my sterilization patients have accepted ESSURE. I think that most sterilization procedures SHOULD be done hysteroscopically. I do the procedures in the office with a Storz Bettocchi scope.
> -----Original Message----- Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:45:44 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.