-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Abn triple marker followup From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com) Mon Jan 8 06:26:29 2007 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: What's the Greatest Medical Advance?" Previous message: Andrew Folley: "Re: Delivery video" In reply to: Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Abn triple marker followup" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Abn triple marker followup" I think the biltaral uterine notching should disappear by 20-21 weeks. Its persistence suggests concern I believe for high placental resistance which may result in hypoperfusion of fetus and IUGR and renal hypoperfusion resulitng in ologhydramnios. Bad prognosis I believe. >From: "Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO" <Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL> >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> >Subject: Abn triple marker followup >Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:10:32 -0600 > >I presented the case of abnormal triple marker with both high AFP and >high hCG. The full chromosome studies were normal and the level 2 >continues to show normal anatomy, normal fluid but less than 3rd >percentile for growth. However, there is bilateral uterine artery >notching that is persisting. > >She is now 23 wks and will likely get admitted to our tertiary referral >center in the next few weeks until delivery planned for after 500gm EFW >is reached. > >Glen > >//SIGNED// > >D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC > >Obstetrician/Gynecologist > >Chief of Obstetrics > >48 MDOS/SGOBO > >RAF Lakenheath, England > >Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130 > > Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130 > >Notice of Confidentiality >Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information >reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. >Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI >37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" >This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the >intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged >information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is >prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the >sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. >Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy >officer. > Next message: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: What's the Greatest Medical Advance?" Previous message: Andrew Folley: "Re: Delivery video" In reply to: Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Abn triple marker followup" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Abn triple marker followup"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:55:25 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.