-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: ACOG Statment From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net) Mon Nov 27 16:47:43 2006 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Louana George, RN, LM, CPM, MA: "Re: ACOG statement" Previous message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: STAN" In reply to: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment" Next in thread: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment" Reply: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment" Even the typo had an echo .. Good points but I agree with Larry - the legal system is the king (or queen).. their point of view are meaningless in my turf anyhow. Trial lawyers run the whole show – sad but true… speaking about truth – there is no question in my mind that “serious intrapartum complications may arise with little or no warning, even in low risk pregnancies.” -- I think I’ll continue to do my obstetrics in a hospital setting… Ef At Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Cheri Van Hoover wrote: > >acmidwife@netscape.net wrote: >> The American College of Nurse-Midwives, along with 8 other groups, has >> sent a letter of response to ACOG regarding their "Out of Hospital >> Birth" statement. It raises a number of very important points and is a >> clear articulation of our professional organization's postion. >> >> http://www.acnm.org/siteFiles/education/ACNMACOGletter11212206.pdf >> >> ac mase CNM > >I believe I hear an echo. This is the exact message which I sent to >this group on 11/25. I thought it was interesting at the time that >there was no response to the ACNM position from any of the list members. > It saddens me that so many seem to prefer flippant repartee to >reasoned discourse. > >Like many others, I believe this is an important subject worthy of >discussion on this list, in other professional forums, in the lay press, >and on the floors of legislatures. Because it is so important I would >much prefer to see a calm and thoughtful approach. > >Cheri > >-- >Cheri Van Hoover, CNM, MS >Faculty, Midwifery Institute of Philadelphia University >Port Hadlock, WA > -- “ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian Next message: Louana George, RN, LM, CPM, MA: "Re: ACOG statement" Previous message: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: STAN" In reply to: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment" Next in thread: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment" Reply: Cheri Van Hoover: "Re: ACOG Statment"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:45:11 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.