-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: STAN From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com) Sat Nov 25 10:45:39 2006 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Cesar Molina: "Re: What do you wear to work WAS When Young Doctors Strut Too Much of Their Stuff" Previous message: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: STAN" In reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: STAN" Next in thread: Mats O Bergstrom: "Re: STAN" Reply: Mats O Bergstrom: "Re: STAN" Bernard here's one study showing little difference in outcome: BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):419-23. Art Looks like yet another subject for metanalysis ... At Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Bernard Cristalli wrote: > >Mats, >Have you got the references of these papers? >Bernard > >Mats O Bergstrom a écrit : > >> STAN (ST-ANalysis, where ST is the the traditional EKG curve between >> the points S and T) is mainly a Swedish invention. I know some of the >> persons with an economic interest in the procedure. There are now two >> heavy studies, one Finnish (early 2006) showing no benefits in >> comparison with traditional CTG, and one Swedish (later 2006) showing >> a slight but significant decrease in neonatal asphyxia without a >> significant rise of the cesarean rate. Lately, some case reports have >> drawn attention, also in mainstream Swedish media, to a suspicion that >> the expected higher safety with STAN compared to traditional CTG has >> been causing obstetricians to postpone an otherwise obvious emergency >> cesarean section. >> >> So, the STAN approach is currently in limbo. >> >> Mats Bergstrom, MD >> Ob Gyn >> South Hospital >> Stockholm >> (on ob-gyn-l since day 1 in 1994) >> >> Bernard Cristalli wrote: >> >>> Does anybody use the STAN for perpartum fetal EKG analysis? >>> What do you think of it and of its easiness? >>> Bernard >>> >>> Devoe LD, Ross M, Wilde C, Beal M, Lysikewicz A, Maier J, et al. >>> United States multicenter clinical usage study of the STAN 21 >>> electronic fetal monitoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 >>> Sep;195(3):729-34. >>> >-- >’ > -- art fougner, md "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton Next message: Cesar Molina: "Re: What do you wear to work WAS When Young Doctors Strut Too Much of Their Stuff" Previous message: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: STAN" In reply to: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: STAN" Next in thread: Mats O Bergstrom: "Re: STAN" Reply: Mats O Bergstrom: "Re: STAN"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:45:11 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.