-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: ACOG statement From: Gordon Goldman (obgyndoc@swbell.net) Wed Nov 15 19:09:15 2006 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Dr. NaseemAhmad: "Re: Gyn: Menorrhagia in a patient with a uterus didephys" Previous message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: persistent HCG" In reply to: Meenan, Anna: "Re: ACOG statement" Next in thread: Cheri Van Hoover: "ACNM Response to ACOG Statement" Reply: Cheri Van Hoover: "ACNM Response to ACOG Statement" Anna, It appears once again that I have not made myself understood or, others have chosen to misinterpret what I said. I never said it was not appropriate for discussion on this forum, nor that others should not engage in debate. If you read my original post you will see that I said was, I will not debate this issue on this forum. I have no right nor any desire to tell anyone else what they may or may not discuss on this forum. Conversely, I have the choice of whether or not to not engage in it. Best regards, -- Gordon M. Goldman, M.D., FACOG Chair, Missouri Section, ACOG On Nov 15, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Meenan, Anna wrote: > Yes, I don't understand what makes it an inappropriate topic for > this forum. It's a legitimate OB topic. And thanks also for your > post, Lynn. A well-thought-out perspective on the subject. > > Anna L. Meenan, MD > >> Actually this is the forum for such discussions. andrew FACOG >> >>> From: "Kris Bagiu, CPM, RM" <kris@metromidwifery.com> >>> Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net >>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> >>> Subject: Re: ACOG statement >>> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:07:51 -0600 >>> >>> Gordon Goldman wrote: >>>> Jamie, >>>> >>>> With all due respect, I am not about to get into those >>>> discussions in this forum. >>> >>> Thank you again. I would not like to disrupt this forum either >>> and wonder where might the appropriate forum where these types of >>> things can be discussed between obstetricians and midwives, >>> outside a legislative session of course. >>> >>> I will accept suggestions by mail privately to divert the topic >>> and potential disruption. >>> >>> Kris Bagiu, CPM, RM >>> Denver, CO >> >> us&source=hmtagline Next message: Dr. NaseemAhmad: "Re: Gyn: Menorrhagia in a patient with a uterus didephys" Previous message: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Gyn: persistent HCG" In reply to: Meenan, Anna: "Re: ACOG statement" Next in thread: Cheri Van Hoover: "ACNM Response to ACOG Statement" Reply: Cheri Van Hoover: "ACNM Response to ACOG Statement"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:45:11 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.