Re: Clinical scenario

From: Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO (Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL)
Thu Oct 12 02:36:03 2006


In fact, it was a fast labor. It was about 2 hours after amniotomy until delivery. Baby did fine and mom did fine.

I guess my real point in bringing this up is more for what defines labor in the close to term patient. We've all seen women that were 3cm at 36 weeks and we did nothing about it, thinking they would declare themselves one way or another. But the thought that being 8cm wasn't declaring themselves made me wonder what would be?

I appreciate the debate though.

Glen

//SIGNED//

D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC

Obstetrician/Gynecologist

Chief of Obstetrics

48 MDOS/SGOBO

RAF Lakenheath, England

Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130

Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130

Notice of Confidentiality Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy officer.

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Garry E. Siegel, M.D. Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Clinical scenario

Agree with all--let her sit in the hospital somewhere until she declares herself. If not obviously laboring, would consider oral PCN (and covert to IV once laboring) to cover GBS since her status is unknown and she is preterm.

Garry

At Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Myer Bornstein wrote: >
>I agree with Efrain, no paint waiting should be a fast labor
>Myer
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
Efrain >> Ramirez
>> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 2:19 PM
>> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>> Subject: Re: Clinical scenario
>>
>> Watch for the baby to fall out!! :) - she is in labor .. ampicillin
2 >> gms stat ,then 1 gm q 4 hours, AROM - no corticosteroids! good luck..
>>
>> Ef
>>
>> >At Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>> >
>> >I thought I'd ask a clinical question to get away from the Op Ed
debate >> >for a bit.
>> >
>> >28 yo G2P1 shows up to our midwife at 36+2 wks for her GBS testing.
Her >> >last delivery was at 37 wks and she is feeling a bit of pressure.
No >> >regular contractions, just some irregular cramping. She happens to
live >> >about 30 minutes from the hospital. On exam the midwife finds that
she >> >is 4-5cm/75% and -2 station.
>> >
>> >Given the history of preterm delivery, the distance from the
hospital >> >she admits her to the ward.
>> >
>> >The next morning, still no regular contractions but is checked again
and >> >is 5-6cm. She doesn't appear to be 'actively' in labor so we sit
tight. >> >
>> >Hospital day 2 (now 36+4) she is checked again and is 6-7cm. The
next >> >morning at 36+5 she is 8cm but still no regular contractions, no
>> >bleeding, no leaking fluid.
>> >
>> >We have a group discussion about her care and come up with several
>> >different options.
>> >
>> >For sake of argument, who would
>> >
>> >a. call her in labor and deliver her now.
>> >b. Wait for her to actually go into 'labor' since she is
>> >technically preterm
>> >c. Amnio her and deliver if mature
>> >d. Give her steroids and deliver in 48 hours
>> >e. Deliver her at 39 weeks if she is still pregnant, but keep her
>> >admitted until then.
>> >
>> >Hope this spurs some debate of a different kind.
>> >
>> >Glen
>> >
>> >//SIGNED//
>> >
>> >D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>> >
>> >Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>> >
>> >Chief of Obstetrics
>> >
>> >48 MDOS/SGOBO
>> >
>> >RAF Lakenheath, England
>> >
>> >Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>> >
>> > Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>> >
>> >Notice of Confidentiality
>> >Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>> >reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments.
>> >Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131,
AFI >> >37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>> >This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of
the >> >intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>> >information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or

distribution is >> >prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the >> >sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. >> >Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the
privacy >> >officer.
>>
>> --
>> " The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
>> it is the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:59 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.