Re: Gyn: Residual ovary/ovarian remnant?

From: Garry E. Siegel, M.D. (garrys@mindspring.com)
Wed Sep 20 11:32:10 2006


Even if she has an ovarian remnant, she is 61 and I would expect an elevated FSH, and thus I don't see the reason to order it.

Similarly, I have heard of using Clomid to stimulate folliculogensis, so that another ultrasound could be done to look for same.

Since she's 61 and menopausal, I've not considered either.

I also don't exactly see why a Ca 125 is warranted, though I don't mind doing one.

Am I missing something?

Garry

At Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Gordon Goldman wrote: >
>Hi Kirsten,
>
>Good to hear from you. Hope things are going well for you.
>
>I too have a patient who has had pathology confirmed RSO about two years ago
>and now has a tender 4cm complex right cystic mass causing significant
>dyspareunia. Did do a CA125 which was normal and MRI looks like it may be
>either ovarian remnant or possible peritoneal cyst. FSH of no value with
>left ovary intact.
>
>--
>Gordon M. Goldman, M.D., FACOG
>Private Practice, St. Louis, Missouri
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Kirsten
>McDaniel
>Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:55 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Gyn: Residual ovary/ovarian remnant?
>
>What is her FSH level. Does she have any sign of ovarian function. I
>had a similar case in someone in her 40s. Her FSH was quite low. I
>operated her and she had an ovarian remnant in the pelvic sidewall. She
>had also had recent surgery with a general surgeon who reported uterus
>and ovaries absent.
>
>At Mon, 18 Sep 2006, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
>>
>>give her some GnRH and see if her estrogen level goes up.
>>
>>Dan
>>
>>On 9/18/06, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. <garrys@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 62 YO P2002 with a year or more of LLQ pain, including trouble raising
>>> her left leg. Records including op notes and pahtology available.
>>>
>>> She was sent to the orthopedist to check out her left hip, and the MRI
>>> showed a bilobed structure around 3 cm. in the left adnexal
>>> reason--such as a lyphatic cyst or an adnexal one if the ovary was
>>> present. An ultrasound done showed a 2.4 by 1.7 by 2.7 cm. cyst
>>> similar to a simple ovarian one on the left side.
>>>
>>> Records:
>>>
>>> 1975 TVH, post. repair no significant pathology noted
>>> 1978 lapscope, Right S and O by laparotomy with LOA. Pathology confirms
>>> ovary/tube removed--hemorrhagic corpus luteum.
>>> 1983 lapscope, Left S and O by laparotomy with LOA. ditto on the
>>> pathology.
>>> 1992 lapscope with LOA--extensive between omentum and sigmoid/left
>>> pelvic wall. "Uterus, tubes and ovaries noted to be absent."
>>>
>>> My suspicion is that the imaging abnormality is a cystic peritoneal
>>> structure and/or adhesive disease, and she probably has recurrent
>>> adhesive disease. I can't help but think of residual ovarian syndrome,
>>> and don't exactly know how to proceed at this point. A recent article
>>> (Am Journal Ob/Gyn, Magtibay, in 2005) was in our ABOG Annual Board
>>> Certification packet (2 of 3).
>>>
>>> For now, she's seeing a general surgeon, and we'll go from there. I may
>>> want to have her see a gyn oncologist, too, if surgery is contemplated.
>>>
>>> Garry
>>>
>>--
>>R. Daniel Braun
>>
>> "The way to health is an aromatic bath and scented massage
>everyday".
>> Hippocrates
>>

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:54:24 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.