Re: One layer uterine closure

From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Sat Sep 2 05:27:13 2006


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Have you got prospective randomized controlled trials proving double layer is better? BC

Kokumo Oyakhire a écrit : > My patients and I would prefer the time honoured two layered unlocked
> closure. I do not mind change(s), but any change in practice should
> have gone through ethically approved researches, at least controlled
> trials. Even the SPCAs still protect there patients.
>
> */"D. Ashley Hill" <dahmd@cfl.rr.com>/* wrote:
>
> Heresy. Actually, I have not locked uterine incisions for over 12
> years
> (you have me beat by a long shot) due to concerns about tissue
> necrosis.
> Everyone asks "what about hemostasis." If you observe the tissue after
> you have completed with your incision line it's obvious if it's
> bleeding
> or not (usually not). What's equally interesting to me is the variety
> of suture material. I know someone who uses 3-0 vicryl for the uterus,
> whereas I use 0-chromic. I guess we're all victims of our training.
>
> Ashley
>
> At Fri, 1 Sep 2006, R. Daniel Braun wrote:
> >
> >One needs to ask are these ONE layer LOCKING sutures or one layer
> NO-LOCKING
> >sutures?
> >I bet the bad results were with locking and the good ones with
> non-locking.
> >
> >Just my opinion and over 40 years observation.
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >On 9/1/06, Dr. Cesar Molina wrote:
> >>
> >> I am a obstetric and gynecologyc surgeon in Costa Rica and have two
> >> experiences with one layer uterine closure. For differente
> >> circumstances I have to open this patients 7 and 8 days after the
> >> section. It was very impressionant the irregular and bad aspect of
> >> uterine scarr healing in two cases. Although the inmediate
> evolution
> >> of the patients was good after reintervention(late evolution I
> don`t
> >> know), I felt very much concerned about the future evolution of
> their
> >> abdominal cavities. My impression was that this two patiens will
> >> depelop an important adherential syndrome. What is your experience
> >> about??
> >>
> >> At Sun, 10 Jun 2001, art fougner, md wrote:
> >> >
> >> >germans had an entirely different experience -
> >> >
> >> >1: Zentralbl Gynakol 1986;108(17):1039-45
> >> >
> >> >[Clinical experiences with a single layer uterine suture in
> cesarean
> >> >section].
> >> >
> >> >[Article in German]
> >> >
> >> >Winkler M, Ruckhaberle KE, Saul S, Forberg J.
> >> >
> >> >In this analysis 536 caesarean sections with a single layer
> uterine
> >> >suture were compared to 256 sections with two layer closure. Their
> >> >relations with regard to indications of operative delivery,
> >> >complications during the puerperium and their courses in
> subsequent
> >> >vaginal deliveries were taken into consideration. - The
> significant
> >> >lower rate of pyrexia and shorter hospital stay of the
> patients may be a
> >> >result of quicker and better healing of the single layer
> suture. The
> >> >increased rate of complications in the puerperium is partially
> due to
> >> >changes in the registry of dates. Absent disturbances during the
> >> >placental period and the occurrence of only one uterine
> rupture, in the
> >> >course of vaginal delivery in a patient with a previous single
> layer
> >> >caesarean section suture, demonstrates the functional
> sufficiency of
> >> >this technic.
> >> >
> >> >PMID: 3538711 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
> >> >
> >> >seems reasonable to perform a formal trial.
> >> >
> >> >art
> >> >
> >> >At Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Steve Raymond wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>Yes, and we are considering enrolling, but we had an
> experience about
> >> four years
> >> >>ago when one of the rural hospitals that refers to us decided
> to start
> >> one layer
> >> >>closures after reading about the Misgav-Ladach technique. We
> found after
> >> a few
> >> >>months that they were suddenly sending us problem cases of
> bleeding and
> >> failure
> >> >>of healing and such like, which had us mystified until they
> informed us
> >> of the
> >> >>change in technique, of which we had not previously been aware.
> >> >>
> >> >>Seems to me that they should have an ethical committee ruling
> on this!
> >> >>stray
> >> >>
> >> >>> The CAESAR study is recruiting in UK, is it not?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Rupak Ranjan Roy
> >> >>> MRCOG
> >> >>
> >> >>--
> >> >>
> >> >>Dr.S.H. Raymond
> >> >>Head of Department of O & G
> >> >>Empangeni Hospital
> >> >>South Africa 3880
> >> >>Phone: (+27) 35-7721111
> >> >>Fax: (+27) 35-7922596
> >> >>
> >> >--
> >> >art fougner, md
> >> >
> >> >A series of 1000 cases begins with but a single anecdote.
> >> >
> >>
> >--
> >R. Daniel Braun
> >
> > "The way to health is an aromatic bath and scented massage
> everyday".
> > Hippocrates
> >
>
> --
> D. Ashley Hill, MD
> Associate Director
> Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
> Medical Director, Loch Haven Ob/Gyn Group
> Division Director, Dept. of Ob/Gyn, Florida Hospital Orlando
> Orlando, Florida
>
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/nowyoucan/pc_mag/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt@565/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html>
> "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." -
> PC Magazine





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:47 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.