Re: Gyn: How to approach a case

From: Richard Chudaoff (rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com)
Mon Aug 21 17:37:04 2006


Garry

If you don't scope her first, then you will never know which cases are scope cases and which cases are open cases. I'm performing my first scheduled open case in three years Wednesday for an 11x25x28 cm uterus, only because MRI suggests it is a leiomyosarcoma.

Example...patient with three previous c-sections and a 16 week sized uterus for hysterectomy. We scoped her and the omentum was entirely plastered to the anterior abdominal wall and anterior of the uterus. Had we opened her, it would have taken 30-45 minutes to just get into the pelvis. Instead we just did the procedure under the omentum, skin to skin in 65 minutes.

However, if there is no one else available I am always willing to travel and teach laparoscopic surgery, or have you come out to Houston.

Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Garry E. Siegel, M.D. Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 5:08 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Gyn: How to approach a case

Dear all:

Thanks for the input.

I am contemplating a transverse incision, likely a Maylard to get more room to work if it is a mess. However, given the fact that this could be an adherent mess, I have thought about a midline one, with my only hesitation being the fact that she's diabetic.

We all have different levels of comfort and skill with LAVH/LSH etc. With utmost respect to Richard and Larry, I don't think that this is a lapscope case, and would you answer that way if it was for your oral boards?

Larry, you may not do any open cases anymore, but I think that a small role remains for selected open cases other than oncology ones.

If she is having a total hysterectomy/BSO for chronic PID, I can't see leaving her cervix (and, she's diabetic and immunocompromised, and at risk for dysplasia), and I can't see what is at all wrong with an open approach. For me, the tactile sensation and soft, blunt lysis of adhesions for a "pus" case is a safer and better approach.

Garry

At Mon, 21 Aug 2006, rmodugno@aol.com wrote: >
>-----Original Message-----
>From: garrys@mindspring.com
>To: ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net
>Sent: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:59 PM
>Subject: Gyn: How to approach a case
>
>40 YO P1001, insulin requiring diabetic, was hospitalized by her FP 3
>weeks ago with a febrile illness, and likely had bilateral small TOAs or
>at least hydrosalpinges on CT. I saw her a couple of days after
>admisssion, and she gave a vague but convincing story of prior problems
>with cysts treated with antibiotics, and maybe an infection. Long story
>short, she sounds like chronic PID with an exacerbation, likely
>worsened/complicated by IDDM.
>
>A follow-up CT at discharge (the FP ordered it) showed bilateral 3 or 4
>cm. hydrosalpinges.
>
>She is of normal build, and her exam recently was pretty benign--she was
>markedly less tender, a retroverted, normal sized uterus and no masses.
>
>I am planning a TAH-BSO soon, and plan a bowel prep.
>
>What type of incision would you make?
>
>Garry
>
>************************
>
>--

>************************
>
>Were you contemplating one other than a transverse (Pfannensteil,
Maylards,etc) ? >
>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>Smoky Mountain OB/Gyn Associates
>64 Eastgate Drive, Sylva, NC 28779
>828-586-7802
>________________________________________________________________________
>Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and
>________________________________________________________________________
IM. All on demand. Always Free. >________________________________________________________________________
>
>________________________________________________________________________

--
Garry E. Siegel, M.D.
Private Practice
Roswell, GA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:54:13 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.