Re: Tetralogy of Fallot w/ absent Pulmonary Valve in Subsequent Pregnancies?

From: Charlie Chambers (ricechaz@earthlink.net)
Sat Jun 24 12:35:25 2006


Assuming no genetic basis for the cardiac anomaly, her recurrence risk is low, roughly 3% in subsequent pregnancies. Genetic amnio won't be of use unless she's AMA. Consider nuchal translucency testing, roughly 40% of CV anomalies will have abnormal testing, and later fetal echo.

On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:39 AM, Jennifer Duggan wrote:

> I have a client who lost her daughter two yrs ago(at almost 2yrs
> old) to
> Tetralogy of Fallot with absent Pulmonary Valve. Her daughter did not
> have any other associated disorders.
>
> She is considering having another baby and is wondering about the risk
> of another child having a heart defect. I have recommended she see a
> genetic counsellor, but she wants to have an idea of what she might be
> in for before going.
>
> The only information I have been able to find is that there is a
> possibility of Tet being associated with the deletion of chromosome 22
> as well as the jagged1 gene in familial related defects. Noone
> else in
> her family has Tet or any other associated syndromes.
>
> Can any of you tell me if there is any increased risk of Tet occurring
> again, or of any other heart defects?
>
> Thanks...:)
> Jennifer Duggan, CPM
>

************************************************************************ **** Charlie Chambers

--
Hood River, OR
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world" -- Mahatma Ghandi. ************************************************************************ *******





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:44:07 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.