Preventing tears

From: Elrod, Darryl G Maj 48 MDOS/SGOBO (Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL)
Thu Jun 8 04:01:01 2006


Richard,

What different maneuvers do you do to manage the posterior shoulder? I'd agree that most of these tears ARE a result of the posterior shoulder and not the head.

Glen

//SIGNED//

D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC

Obstetrician/Gynecologist

Chief of Obstetrics

48 MDOS/SGOBO

RAF Lakenheath, England

Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130

Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130

Notice of Confidentiality Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information reflected on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy officer.

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Richard Chudacoff, MD Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:20 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Informed consent

Joe C is correct. I've cut maybe 2 or 3 episiotomies in the last 3 years. If you know the pelvic dynamics and vectors most tears are no greater than a second degree. Understanding that the big tears come from the posterior shoulder and not the head I spend as much care, if not more, delivering the shoulders. Of course, I have had a 'fourth degree' tear in a patient with an intact perineum...a joy to repair

Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 10:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Informed consent

I'm curious about your point with the first sentence-are you implying that multips sustain more damage with or without episiotomy? I don't think it goes without saying that episiotomies are done only when necessary. How could it, when episiotomy rates vary so much from one caregiver to another? I have worked with doctors (and nurses, just so you know I'm not picking on doctors) who believe episiotomy is always necessary, and others who do them only for distress. Who's right? The average woman doesn't know enough to question her doctor's episiotomy rate, beyond "of course, doctor, if you think I need one", which leaves her at the mercy of how informed the doctor is. Not every person out there delivering babies is as well informed and up-to-date as those on this list. Episiotomy is a surgical procedure, and like any other surgical procedure, the patient has the right to decide when she is willing to assume those risks and when she is not.

Why is patient autonomy such a threat?

At Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Joe Cutchin wrote: >
>Its a shame women aren't having 4 to 8 vaginal deliveries so you
>youngster could see what the perineum looks like afterwards. It goes
>without saying that episiotomy is used only when necessary. I would be
>surprised if all here don't have that discussion with their patients
>during the gestation. Enough. Joe C
>
>Jamie wrote:
>> Advisor, not decision maker. Fortunately, my doctor trusts me. When
we >> discussed episiotomy I told him I wanted one only if the baby was in
>> trouble and crowning. Many women would rather take their chances
with a >> tear, especially given the controversy over whether episiotomy
actually >> prevents tearing. There are an awful lot of 3rd and 4th degree tears
>> occurring after episiotomy.
>>
>> For any surgical procedure, the patient has the right of consent or
>> refusal. Since the true need for episiotomy really isn't

predictable, >> the patient should be informed by the physician of the potential for
>> that need, of the risk of not doing one, and of the potential
>> complications, and should decide prior to labor under what
circumstances >> she wishes her caregiver to perform one.
>>
>> At Tue, 6 Jun 2006, RModugno@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>In a message dated 6/6/2006 8:15:35 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>>>ajfields@pine-net.com writes:
>>>
>>>IMO the owner of the perineum, but then I have one so I'm a little
>>>sensitive about it. I think it should be carefully discussed during
>>>prenatal care and the woman should define the circumstances under
which >>>she will consent to an episiotomy. There has to be some trust
there, >>>though, b/c it's up to whoever is catching to stick with that
request. >>>
>>>What unmitigated balderdash! I'm sorry, I don't have a crystal ball -
and >>>I've been doing this for 30 years and I still can't tell whether the
patient >>>will start to tear during delivery when I see her during the prenatal
period.. >>>Sorry, I'm just some idiot, non-caring,.lying, male chauvanist
obstetrician, >>>whose episiotomy rate has dropped dramatically over the past years- I
talk to >>>my patients, I tell them under which circumstances an episiotomy
might be >>>indicated,they PAY me for MY EXPERTISE and I take it that you are
saying that >>>the owner of the perineum is the one who should have the say whether
an >>>episiotomy is done or not. Does the perineum owner have the expertise
to make that >>>judgement call? Surely the physician should act as an advisor in such
a >>>situation. Funny, my patients seem to trust me.
>>>
>>>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>>>Marietta, GA
>>
>> --
>> JFields, RN, BSN
>>

--
JFields, RN, BSN




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:56:09 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.