Re: Sad but true --->Call the question!

From: doctorjoe@aol.com
Thu Feb 16 13:00:43 2006


NOW you gave a straight answer. And it didn't take all that many words, did it? Nice.

Joe P.

-----Original Message----- From: Jamie <ajfields@pine-net.com> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:04 -0600 Subject: Re: Sad but true --->Call the question!

I thought I had said upside down and sideways that it is reasonable for a woman to specifically request a woman (or a man). It may not always be possible, but it's reasonable.

At Thu, 16 Feb 2006, doctorjoe@aol.com wrote: >
>So you are saying it is REASONABLE for a woman to specifically request a woman.
That's what you're saying. The more hypothetical scenarious you throw up, the clearer it is that this is what your answer is. >
>PEOPLE, it's OKAY to give a straight answer!!!! Hello!!!!
>
>Joe P.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jamie <Call the question!">ajfields@pine-net.com>
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <Call the question!">ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:42:10 -0600
>Subject: Re: Sad but true --->Call the question!
>
>Not quite (though I have friends who would say so). Girls/women should
>not be forced to have exams by men. If circumstances force it, their
>feelings should not be treated as silly. We get enough messages that
>our intuition is faulty and should be ignored as it is. That should not
>happen in a medical setting. I recently participated in a poll of the
>women on a specific board (we have an obsession with birth in common,
>did not previously know of the others' histories). Every single woman
>has been violated in some way-some minor, others very major. Every
>single one of us ignored our intuition about our abusers, or if it
>happened in childhood, were told we were being silly and unfair. Most
>of us could have escaped or avoided abuse if our feelings had been taken
>seriously. Telling women that their feelings of discomfort about having
>a male GYN don't matter is one more experience that reinforces to them
>that they should ignore their feelings.
>
>It's not about the gender of the provider, it's about the woman's
>feelings about the gender of the provider.
>
>Would it be easier to answer specific situations?
>
>1) Long term patient of a male provider asks for a referral to a female
>provider for her teenage daughter because the daughter is embarrassed to
>be examined by a man. Is this wrong?
>
>2)woman presents to the ER with symptoms consistent with the
>obstetric/gynecologial emergency of your choice. Assume immediate care
>is necessary. She is assigned to a male doc. There is a qualified
>female doc in house. She requests a female doc.
>
>3)same scenario, but no qualified female doctor in house
>
>4)OB patient has prenatal care with a group of mixed gender OBs. She
>states at her 36 week prenatal that she insists on a female provider at
>birth
>
>5)OB patient from out of town presents in labor. She requests a female
>doc for delivery. There is a female doc in house.
>
>At Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Call the question!">doctorjoe@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> So you've now set up the argument that girls/women SHOULD NOT start having
>exams by men since that's a dangerous desensitization and may lead to serious
>problems in the future.
>>
>>Seems to me this gets to the heart of my calling the question.
>>
>>Why is it that no one will give a straight answer on this? LOL
>>
>>Joe P.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jamie <Call the question!">Call the question!">ajfields@pine-net.com>
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <Call the question!">Call the question!">ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>>Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:13:09 -0600
>>Subject: Re: Sad but true --->Call the question!
>>
>><SNIP>
>>
>>I am very concerned at the message that women and especially young girls
>>should just submit to examination by men, ignoring their instincts. Not
>>everyone will be bothered by having a male examiner (I really am not,
>>but I don't think anyone believes that at this point), but setting a
>>precedent of "just ignore your feelings" IMO increases the risk that
>>those girls will ignore their feelings in more dangerous situations.
>>Girls have enough problems feeling that they have a right to control
>>their own bodies without taking that away in a medical setting.
>
>--
>JFields, RN, BSN
>

--
JFields, RN, BSN




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:52:04 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.