Re: VBAC immediately available policy

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Tue Feb 7 11:32:34 2006


All too often the patient ends up being a CLIENT ... by seeking legal counsel.

Art

At Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Jamie wrote: >
>No, you are correct. They physician ends up with the responsibility.
>The client SHOULD, and that's whay makes me sad
>
>At Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>
>>I disagree wholeheartedly --ACOG stated those rules -- "immediately
>>available" means exactly that-- trying to bend the definition is, IMHO,
>>cheating... the one who takes the responsibility will be the physician
>>- don't make me laugh if you argue that the patient will...please....
>>
>>Ef
>>
>>>At Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Jamie wrote:
>>>
>>>The VBAC advocates weren't the ones who made the rules about what
>>>constitutes immediately available. I think it's incredibly sad that
>>>women and their doctors can not develop a level of trust that allows for
>>>an honest explanation of the risks, and a decision by a client (okay,
>>>patient) who takes responsibility.
>>>
>>>At Mon, 6 Feb 2006, D. Ashley Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>At Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Lawyers will be laughing at us -- us trying to define "immediately
>>>>>available" --Jesus!!!! - if ACOG wanted it another way - it should say -
>>>>>within 15 minutes - 30 minutes, 2 nanoseconds -- I no longer do VABC's
>>>>>--it is not wort it..period..
>>>>>
>>>>>At our hospital, although it has in-house anesthesia - if there is a
>>>>>VBAC - the Ob, and everything that surrounds him--OR crew, etc , must be
>>>>>in house...any other way would be ---somebody said "suicide"?
>>>>
>>>>That's probably the safest course for the patient (and the risk
>>>>managers) but the least attractive for the ob and anesthesia team. I
>>>>wonder how hospitals that no longer "allow" VBACs handle patients who
>>>>refuse a repeat cesarean. Does the on-call team have to come in and
>>>>stand by for the entire labor trial? Can you imagine how hot the on call
>>>>ob and anesthesiologist would be if a patient previously unknown to them
>>>>showed up, refused a repeat section, but hospital bylaws mandated that
>>>>they stay in house the entire labor? I think VBAC advocates are unaware
>>>>of the number of patients in the office or operating room who may go
>>>>unattended while the physician is on the labor unit with one patient who
>>>>demands a VBAC. Sure, it's great for her, but not so hot for the
>>>>several dozen patients awaiting care for what may be equally important
>>>>health care needs.
>>>>
>>>>Ashley
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>D. Ashley Hill, MD
>>>>Associate Director
>>>>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
>>>>Florida Hospital Family Practice Residency
>>>> and Loch Haven Ob/Gyn Group
>>>>Orlando, Florida
>>>>
>>>--
>>>JFields, RN, BSN
>>>
>>--
>>“ The greatest obstacle to knowledge is not ignorance,
>>it is the illusion of knowledge.” Daniel J. Boorstin - Historian
>>
>--
>JFields, RN, BSN
>

--
art fougner, md

Buy Danish!





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:42:45 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.