Re: Cesarean on Demand

From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)
Thu Dec 29 20:04:57 2005


Hasn't been mentioned in this thread these last few submissions, but when ACOG first published an opinion on elective sections a few years ago, Dr. Hale (rightfully I believe) mentioned patient autonomy....given the fact there are medically valid pros and cons in favor of both methods of delivery, I believe the patient's autonomy is to be respected. As for costs to the system,. a scheduled cs is not inherently more expensive than vag delivery, at least in some studies...beyond which, cost - if not excessive and ruinous to the social fiduciary responsiblility of the profession - should not trump patient autonomy...my one and half cents worth tonite, :-)

Hanbk

"Elrod, Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO" <Darryl.elrod@LAKENHEATH.AF.MIL> wrote: But unlike plastic surgery, delivery (or birth) of the baby isn't really elective. The mode of delivery is in this case simply a choice. Like any other procedure in medicine there are alternatives presented. Educate the patient and let them decide. Would the insurance company not pay for an open appendectomy because the laparoscopic way is quicker?

Glen

-----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Anna Meenan, MD Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 1:10 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Cesarean on Demand

I'm guessing you would be under no more obligation to do an elective C-sec than you would be to do elective plastic surgery that the state declined to pay for.

Anna Meenan, MD

At Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. wrote: >
>I have an interesting dilemma for y'all. From my understanding, when
>confronted by a patient requesting a "cesarean on demand", one has the
>option of either abiding by their wishes or "firing" them as a patient
and >informing them to find another provider who will comply with their
wishes, >knowing that I am responsible for 30 days - which in obstetrics, if
they are >near term or in labor, keeps one on the hook.
>
>Because I have many Medicaid patients, we inquired of the state what
their >stand is on payment for "cesarean on demand". Their response was that
they >will only pay for "medically indicated" procedures and if there is not
a >"valid" reason for a procedure, such as a cesarean section, they will
not >reimburse.
>
>So, if a Medicaid patient requests a "cesarean on demand" and I respond
by >saying that I can't/won't because I will not get paid, how does this
sit >legally???
>Lynn
>
>--
>Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D.
>Maternal-Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN
>Rocky Mountain Women's Health
>2835 Fort Missoula Rd., Suite 304
>Missoula, Montana, 59804
>406-549-0978
>fax 406-549-0987
>e-mail: apgar10@montanadsl.net
>

Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:41:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.