Re: 17P- Controversy or Typo
From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com)
Wed Dec 7 16:42:31 2005
Sorry, Typo of course. I was born in New Jersey and I know you are Jewish.
It does have a certain ring to it, dont you think??? andy
>From: "Richard Chudacoff, MD" <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: RE: 17P- Controversy or Typo
>Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:33:08 -0600
>
>New name, or typo?
>
>Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
>Folley
>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:19 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: RE: 17P- Controversy
>
> >I have used a place in Jew Jersey.
>
>andy
> >From: "AFuentes" <afuentes@mindspring.com>
> >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
> >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
> >Subject: RE: 17P
> >Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:53:00 -0600
> >
> >What is the controversy? I haven't come across any issues with the Meis
> >study. Can you fill me in?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Armando Fuentes, MD
> >Maternal Fetal Ctr
> >Winter Park, FL
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Andrew
> >Folley
> >Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:36 AM
> >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >Subject: RE: 17P
> >
> >Some controversy exists as to whether it works at all. Qustions regarding
> >Meis original studyies. New research going on for use of 17 OH cream in
> >vagina. andy
> >
> > >From: ainsron@sbcglobal.net (Dr. Ainsworth)
> > >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
> > >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
> > >Subject: 17P
> > >Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:52:15 -0600
> > >
> > >For those of you using or considering 17P for patients with Hx of
> > >preterm labor, How would you use it in which of the following
> > >circumstances?:
> > >
> > >1. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of first pregnancy at 40 wks, no
> > >complications, no PTL; second pregnancy at 36 weeks, PROM, followed by
> > >spontaneous labor.
> > >
> > >2. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of first pregnancy complicated by PTL from
> > >30 weeks; delivery at 35 weeks, second pregnancy delivery at 39 weeks,
> > >no PTL, not given 17P.
> > >
> > >3. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of term delivery at 39 weeks; second
> > >pregnancy PTL from 30 weeks, delivery at 36 weeks.
> > >
> > >4. 25 yo G3 P2002, history of term delivery at 39 weeks; second
> > >pregnancy PTL from 30 weeks, delivery at 39 weeks.
> > >
> >
>
|
|
