Re: 17P

From: Charlie Chambers (ricechaz@gorge.net)
Wed Dec 7 09:54:54 2005


I would not in those instances. Without more significant PTD risk would be hesitant to use something that is still considered investigational though of low risk.

On Dec 6, 2005, at 9:52 PM, Dr. Ainsworth wrote:

> For those of you using or considering 17P for patients with Hx of
> preterm labor, How would you use it in which of the following
> circumstances?:
>
> 1. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of first pregnancy at 40 wks, no
> complications, no PTL; second pregnancy at 36 weeks, PROM, followed by
> spontaneous labor.
>
> 2. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of first pregnancy complicated by PTL from
> 30 weeks; delivery at 35 weeks, second pregnancy delivery at 39 weeks,
> no PTL, not given 17P.
>
> 3. 25 yo G3 P1102, history of term delivery at 39 weeks; second
> pregnancy PTL from 30 weeks, delivery at 36 weeks.
>
> 4. 25 yo G3 P2002, history of term delivery at 39 weeks; second
> pregnancy PTL from 30 weeks, delivery at 39 weeks.
>

************************************************************************ **** Charlie Chambers

--
Hood River, OR
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"Almost anything you do will seem insignificant but it is very important that you do it....You must be the change you wish to see in the world" -- Mahatma Ghandi. ************************************************************************ *******





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:53:48 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.