![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 41 week InductionFrom: Raymond Stephen (stephen.raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au)Sun Dec 4 21:09:00 2005
Only those where the baby is better out than in. Steve -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Monday, 5 December 2005 2:55 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: 41 week Induction In message <4536092D6B1A8140A17AEDB95566284806C61CAF@RHHLEX01.health.local>, "R aymond Stephen" writes:
> In my training no emphasis was placed on the "latent phase of labour"
> would dismiss patients with no progress as being still in latent I totally agree. How many patients do you induce? el Tasmania Together 5 Year Review: Have your say http://www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au/
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:53:48 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.