Re: Group B Strep

From: Jefferson Delfino (dr.jefferson@uol.com.br)
Fri Dec 2 14:06:07 2005


In matter of fact this rate occurs at private hospital. The right one is around (official) 34% at all. By the way No one can show the problem with C/S. I use to say that: we only can face trobles when the C/S is properly indicated. Here a lot of Gyn/Ob considerer vagina a noble part of body and to avoid scars, urinary incontinecy, etc. I think the number of C/S will increase very muchall around the wrold. It,s a very good surgery and safe. We are walking fast for a one or two babies for families, pregnancies are coming late for the women, well C/S is a good think. I know when I say this all of you think we are losting ours mind, but sometimes we can be right. At least, but not last that is a good test even for C/S, you don't think so? Jefferson

---------- Início da mensagem original ----------- De: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Para: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net Cc: Data: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:28:25 -0600 Assunto: Re:Group B Strep > Jefferson
> I thought Brazil had a C-section rate approaching 80%??? Do you still do
> GBS screens at 36 weeks?andrew
>
> >From: "Jefferson Delfino"
> >Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
> >To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> >Subject: Re:Group B Strep
> >Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:26:24 -0600
> >
> >Here I used to do the test regularly around the 36 w, twins, risk
> >pregnancy.
> >Sorocaba city - SP - Brazil
> >
> >Jefferson Delfino MD
> >
> >---------- Início da mensagem original -----------
> >De: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
> >Para: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net
> >Cc:
> >Data: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:53:09 -0600
> >Assunto: Group B Strep
> > > I can't answer for other places, but I know that, wherever I have been,
> > > Group B strep has always been of interest even if not a routine
> > > investigation. Thus if someone asked for the test to be done it would
> > > be, if facilities were available. In my last hospital the lab would
> > > have been able to culture it on an ad hoc basis but didn't have the
> > > facilities to screen large numbers, whereas where I am now efforts are
> > > made to swab everyone at 36 weeks. Would someone be able to sue
> > > successfully in another country? I doubt it, because the lawyers and
> > > expert witnesses would not regard it as a breach if it were not standard
> > > of care in the host country.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Elrod
> > > Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005 7:22 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> > > Subject: RE: Dr.Klein, where are you
> > >
> > > Steve,
> > >
> > > I'm curious about something in that statement. Knowing that in the US
> > > it is standard of care to test for and to treat GBS, what would you say
> > > to a relative that moved to a country that did not practice along those
> > > same lines?
> > >
> > > It is that way in at least a few of our host nations where our service
> > > women and dependants are seen. Should that be seen as a breech of US
> > > standards, or just being assimilated into their culture and practices
> > > and deemed an acceptable risk as we are in their country?
> > >
> > > Glen
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
> > > Raymond Stephen
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 1:17 AM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> > > Subject: RE: Dr.Klein, where are you
> > >
> > > The difference between obstetrics in the USA and that in Britain comes
> > > down to a fundamental difference in the organisation of medicine in the
> > > two countries - socialised medicine (the NHS) and capitalist medicine.
> > > Despite all its faults the NHS allows for an integration of obstetrics
> > > into a model which covers all needs under one organisation. The thread
> > > about GBS highlights the fact that different societies have different
> > > rates of Streptococcal colonisation, and what is appropriate in one
> > > country is not in another.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Henry
> > > Gregor
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2005 12:02 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
> > > Subject: Re: Dr.Klein, where are you
> > >
> > > Amen! Clearly Zach is correct in noting the degradation of this topic to
> > > trivial responses, which is not the same as saying the thread topic is
> > > trivial. However, it is an apples and orange thing to compare practices
> > > from two different venues w/o noting (albeit sadly, no doubt) that what
> > > occurs in one place or the other is not free of the cultural, legal and
> > > other sociological factors that impact on the process. Gosh, I'd like to
> > > do midwifery in GB, with a social compact society that accepts both the
> > > advantages and any possible disadvantages inherent to the process. For
> > > the many reasons noted earlier, that practice model doesn't work here.
> > > To say folks should work for change is admirable, though it is not
> > > gonna' happen...perhaps we should all think "Serenity Prayer" here...as
> > > in Lord give me the wisdom to...etc., etc. (I suspect most respondents
> > > have no trouble acknowledging the aptness of the prayer.)
> > >
> > > We might all remember the line re a fa! natic being one who cannot stop
> > > talkiing about a subject and who cannot change the subject. Gail, I hope
> > > you ultimately do well without your nicotine.
> > >
> > > Hank
> > > RModugno@aol.com wrote:
> > >
> > > In a message dated 11/29/2005 7:00:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > > ricechaz@gorge.net writes:
> > >
> > > I wouldn't jump to the assumption that anyone posting
> > > here is guilty of trivializing our patients problems.
> > >
> > > Especially Zach Newton!
> > >
> > > Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
> > >
> > > Marietta, GA
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it
> > > free.
> > >
> > > .com/unlimited/>
> > >
> > > Tasmania Together 5 Year Review: Have your say
> > > http://www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au/
> > >
> > > Tasmania Together 5 Year Review: Have your say
> >http://www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au/
> > >
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:53:48 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.