The end of dipsticks?

From: Anna Meenan, MD (annam@uic.edu)
Mon Nov 14 20:12:52 2005


What do y'all think?

--
              Anna Meenan, MD, FAAFP

Routine dipstix for protein and glucose at each antenatal visit is not needed

To identify the scientific evidence to support routine urine screening for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, researchers in Maine, USA searched Medline (1966-2004), the Cochrane review, AHRQ National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, and Google, for studies on proteinuria or glycosuria in pregnancy. They found 6 studies investigating glycosuria as a predictor for gestational diabetes mellitus, or proteinuria as a predictor for preeclampsia (1 examined both). Because every study used different dipstick methods of determining results, or definitions of abnormal, each was evaluated separately.

They found "Glycosuria is found at some point in about 50% of pregnant women; it is believed to be due to an increased glomerular filtration rate. The renal threshold for glucose is highly variable and may lead to a positive test result for glycosuria despite normal blood sugar. High intake of ascorbic acid or high urinary ketone levels may result in false-positive results. Four published studies assessed the value of glycosuria as a screen for gestational diabetes. All used urine dipsticks. Three of the four most likely overestimate the sensitivity of glycosuria for predicting gestational diabetes."

The researchers concluded "Routine dipstick screening for protein and glucose at each prenatal visit should be abandoned. Women who are known or perceived to be at high risk for gestational diabetes or preeclampsia should continue to be monitored closely at the discretion of their clinician"

The Journal of Family Practice November 2005. Vol. 54, No. 11©2005 Dowden Health Media No need for routine glycosuria/proteinuria screen in pregnant women. William A. Alto, MD, MPH. Correspondence to William A. Alto waalto@dartmouth.edu

Category W. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Family Planning, U. Urinary System, T. Endocrine/Metabolic/Nutritional. Keywords: antenatal, screening, glycosuria, proteinuria, preeclampsia, diabetes, literature review. Synopsis edited by Dr Jim Vause, Blenheim, New Zealand. Posted on Global Family Doctor 15 November 2005





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:41:34 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.