Re: Impaired Glucose Tolerance vs Gestational Diabetes - treatment?

From: Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD (zygote@icsi.net)
Sat Nov 12 10:54:22 2005


The screen is exactly that - a screen. It has false positives and theorectically false negatives. The false negatives are at least 20% so a number of folks will have completely normal 3h Dx tests.

The other question has been covered in recent posts with use og Diabetic type of diet for all abn patients.

On 12 Nov 2005 at 10:00, Natalie Melanson Martin wrote:

> Thanks everyone for all your info.
>
> Here is an interesting case I had recently. 35 yo G2P1, average
> weight, no family hx diabetes. During her 1st pregnancy, she had
> Impaired Glucose Intolerance, and was referred to the Diabetes Centre
> for diet counselling and was monitoring her blood sugars. Baby was
> around 7-8lbs. For the current pregnancy, she started testing her
> blood sugars around 22 weeks as she still had the glucose monitor, and
> she also works in a hospital with nurses who were urging her to test
> her blood sugars! Because of the history, she was sent for a GTT
> around 27 weeks. Before the results came in, she called me to report
> she had had values of 12-15 several evenings in a row! She insisted
> the glucose monitor had been calibrated properly. I immediately
> referred her to the Diabetes Centre again, with GTT results pending,
> sure it would come back abnormal. Well, it actually came back with all
> normal values!! I talked to the Diabetes Centre's endocrinologist, who
> recommended continuing to monitor her because of the high values and
> then repeating the test in a few weeks as those are pretty high
> values. She has had diet counselling and reports her blood sugars have
> been normal ever since. She also admitted that the high values she had
> had followed some very rich meals. So what I am wondering is, how
> valuable is the GTT, and how valuable is daily blood sugar monitoring?
> If she hadn't been taking her blood sugars daily, and we had just done
> the GTT as planned, we wouldn't be concerned, but now I feel we can't
> really ignore those high values and need to monitor her for at least a
> bit longer.
>
> Another question I have is: if you do a 50g OGCT which is high and
> then do a 75g or 100g GTT which has all normal values, do you still
> treat the woman as having impaired glucose tolerance? My understanding
> is that the OGCT is highly sensitive which is why it's only a screen,
> but if it's abnormal even with a normal GTT should you still intervene
> with diet counseling and daily glucose monitoring, which is what we
> tend to do with IGT?
>
> thanks,
>
> Natalie Melanson, RM
> Sudbury Community Midwifery Practice
>

--
Robert J. Carpenter, Jr. MD
6624 Fannin, #2720
St. Luke's Medical Tower
Houston,TX 77030-2339
713-795-4600




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:02:27 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.