-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Amnioinfusion From: Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. (apgar10@montanadsl.net) Wed Nov 2 10:33:09 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Dr Eberhard W Lisse: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Previous message: doctorjoe@aol.com: "Re: FRI:Colloquialism" In reply to: Jamie: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Next in thread: Dr Eberhard W Lisse: "Re: Amnioinfusion" First of all, based on several legal opinions I have gotten both locally and nationally during participation as an expert in cases, hospital policies and procedures are nursing guidelines and physicians can usurp these by simply writing an order. In doing so, they obviously assume the responsibility for same. Further, in our institution, the policies and procedures are written solely by the nursing staff and updated by same. Physician input is not engendered or accepted. Second, based a good study published by Wenstrom, et al in '95, encompassing 644,000 deliveries and over 22,000 amnioinfusions, the protocol utilized for amnioinfusion made no difference in the incidence of any untoward outcomes. As such, statements regarding closely monitoring intrauterine pressure or weighing chucks to determine the efflux of infused fluid from the uterus are all futile measures that only serve to increase the anxiety level of the nursing staff and patients. The bottom line here is that without basis, a procedure that has been widely utilized and studied since 1985, was discontinued unilaterally by nursing staff - I wasn't notified prior to discontinuation. And worse, it was working and by stopping, placed the patient in the potential jeopardy of surgery. In follow-up, I have a new amnioinfusion protocol with supporting literature being disseminated to the department as we speak. Lynn -- Lynn D. Montgomery, M.D. Maternal-Fetal Medicine, OB/GYN Rocky Mountain Women's Health 2835 Fort Missoula Rd., Suite 304 Missoula, Montana, 59804 406-549-0978 fax 406-549-0987 e-mail: apgar10@montanadsl.net -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Jamie Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:54 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Amnioinfusion Quick intro first. I 'm a L&D nurse sidelined by latex allergy and general birth junkie. I get my fix by lurking here and debating birth on other boards. So you know my bias, 4 of my 5 children were born at home. I intend to remain mostly a lurker here. IRT the amnioinfusion disagreement, a clear and current policy would have protected the nurse. If the order was counter to the policy, she would be risking her own license and livelihood in following it. If the order was covered by the policy, she was clearly wrong and needs education. If there is no clear policy, once should be written to protect both the nurse and the physician. Nurses are in a difficult position as well. We can be held responsible for following orders that are unsafe or practicing inconsistently with hospital policy. At the same time, in many hospitals, policies are not kept current, placing us in the position of choosing between a policy that may not protect us b/c it is unsafe, and an order that goes counter to policy which leaves us equally unprotected. Reading this list over the past year has given me a much more sympathetic view of OBs in this litigious climate. I'm sure it is difficult when your own career is constantly at risk to remember that others may be in the same position. In the specific situation described, I would have left the infusion running, carefully observed IUPC pressures as well as the patient for symptoms of increased IUP, and if I was unsure of the safety of continuing contacted the physician to discuss the order. Especially given that the treatment improved the decels. At Tue, 1 Nov 2005, RModugno@aol.com wrote: > >In a message dated 10/31/2005 8:19:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, >forcep@intercom.net writes: > >Thats why obstetrical units need a Chairman of the Department who has >control of policy over physicians and nurses. And should be paid by >the monster, the Hospital,which should have the deep liabilty pocket. > >Exactly! This is a medical decision, not a nursing one! > >Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG >Marietta, GA -- Jamie Next message: Dr Eberhard W Lisse: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Previous message: doctorjoe@aol.com: "Re: FRI:Colloquialism" In reply to: Jamie: "Re: Amnioinfusion" Next in thread: Dr Eberhard W Lisse: "Re: Amnioinfusion"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:41:34 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.