Re: Interesting case

From: Terrence.Jones@kp.org
Thu Sep 29 16:57:29 2005


This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 006782B28825708B_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Think the mention of pheo is 'close' in proximity at least -- nml LFT's except for elevated LDH, accomp by HTN and RUQP makes me think partial renal infarction? She's not in A Fib with an occult stenotic mitral valve? Thrombophilia with 4 prior nml AGA term preg's seems a bit unlikely. /tj

"R. Daniel Braun" <rd.braun@gmail.com> Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net 09/29/2005 09:49 AM Please respond to ob-gyn-l

To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net> cc: Subject: Interesting case

I want to present this as an unknown and see if anybody can get the real diagnosis. 26 Y/O G5 P 4004 LMP 2-9-05 EDC 11-16-05 confirmed by 23 week US. All of her prior pregnancies were NSVD's of FT appropriate weight babies at term and without complications. On 9-19-05 at 31 wks 4 days BP was 124/90 and urine protein was 1+, it had been trace 3 weeks earlier. In the triage area, her BP varied from 120-150/ 84-102. She was admitted to hospital for observation and multiple labs which were all normal except for uric acid of 8.6 and LDH of 648. She was kept on Bed Rest with Bathroom privileges and closely monitored.24 hr Urine protein was 450 mg/24 hours. EFW by US was 1330 gms. Betamethazone was given over 24 hours startin on 9-25-05. She did well without incident or change until 16:40 hrs on 9-28-05,(33 weeks gestation) when the resident was called to see her for severe RUQ pain. BP was 168/97 T 96.0 and she was exquisitely tender in RUQ and epigastrium, there was no rebound noted. She was transferred to L&D, Liver function tests and CBC were obtained. LFT's were normal, except for LDH of 636. Hgb was 14, up from 13.8, 3 days before; platelets wer 247K up from 186K, 3 days before. Magnesium Sulfate was started and she was observed. At 20:25 hrs, she was feeling fine with no pain at all. BP was 120/84. Urine output was 250cc/hr since 17:00 hrs. On 9-29-05 at 00:10 hrs, she de3veloped a recurrence of her pain. BP 140/ 80. Again exquisitely tender with no rebound. Pain is such that patient is writhing in the bed. She had had 3 episodes of emesis over the last 6 hours. Fetal monitor was reassuring. Normal reflexes. LDH now 1107. Diferential includes Cholecystitis, severe pre-eclampsia, and Gastric upset. She was given Morphine Sulfate for the pain and it went away again, only to return at 03:00 hours. Exam remains the same. At this time it was felt that she should be delivered by C/S through a vertical incision because of the possibility of Liver Capsule rupture. She was crossmatched for several units of blood (8). The provisional diagnosis at this time was atypical severe pre-eclampsia. Is there anyone there who wouldn't have delivered her at this point ? She was delivered of 3# 6 oz. 1532 gm apgar 9/9 male. It was noted that there was no hemoperitoneum and the uterine incision was closed.

This is where I am going to stop and see what you all think we found with our abdominal exploration.

Dan

--
R. Daniel Braun
       Kinky for Governor

--=_alternative 006782B28825708B_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Think the mention of pheo is 'close' in proximity at least -- &nbsp;nml LFT's except for elevated LDH, accomp by HTN and RUQP makes me think partial renal infarction? She's not in A Fib with an occult stenotic mitral valve? Thrombophilia with 4 prior nml AGA term preg's seems a bit unlikely. &nbsp; /tj</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; </font> <br> <table width0%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>&quot;R. Daniel Braun&quot; <rd.braun@gmail.com></b></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net</font> <p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/29/2005 09:49 AM</font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to ob-gyn-l</font> <br> <td><font size=1 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net></font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</font> <br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Interesting case</font></table> <br> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">I want to present this as an unknown and see if anybody can get the real diagnosis.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">26 Y/O G5 P 4004 LMP 2-9-05 EDC 11-16-05 confirmed by 23 week US. </font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">All of her prior pregnancies were NSVD's of FT appropriate weight babies at term and without complications.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">On 9-19-05 at 31 wks 4 days BP was 124/90 and urine protein was 1+, it had been trace 3 weeks earlier. In the triage area, her BP varied from 120-150/ 84-102. She was admitted to hospital for observation and multiple labs which were all normal except for uric acid of &nbsp;8.6 and LDH of 648. She was kept on Bed Rest with Bathroom privileges and closely monitored.24 hr Urine protein was 450 mg/24 hours. EFW by US was 1330 gms. Betamethazone was given over 24 hours startin on 9-25-05.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">She did well without incident or change until 16:40 hrs on 9-28-05,(33 weeks gestation) when the resident was called to see her for severe RUQ pain. BP was 168/97 T 96.0 and she was exquisitely tender in RUQ and epigastrium, there was no rebound noted. She was transferred to L&D, Liver function tests and CBC were obtained. LFT's were normal, except for LDH of 636. Hgb was 14, up from 13.8, 3 days before; platelets wer 247K up from 186K, 3 days before. Magnesium Sulfate was started and she was observed.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">At 20:25 hrs, she was feeling fine with no pain at all. BP was 120/84. Urine output was 250cc/hr since 17:00 hrs.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">On 9-29-05 at 00:10 hrs, she de3veloped a recurrence of her pain. BP 140/ 80. Again exquisitely tender with no rebound. Pain is such that patient is writhing in the bed. She had had 3 episodes of emesis over &nbsp;the last 6 hours. Fetal monitor was reassuring. Normal reflexes. LDH now 1107. Diferential includes Cholecystitis, severe pre-eclampsia, and Gastric upset. She was given Morphine Sulfate for the pain and it went away again, only to return at 03:00 hours. Exam remains the same. At this time it was felt that she should be delivered by C/S through a vertical incision because of the possibility of Liver Capsule rupture. She was crossmatched for several units of blood (8). The provisional diagnosis at this time was atypical severe pre-eclampsia. </font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Is there anyone there who wouldn't have delivered her at this point ?</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">She was delivered of 3# 6 oz. 1532 gm apgar 9/9 male. It was noted that there was no hemoperitoneum and the uterine incision was closed.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">This is where I am going to stop and see what you all think we found with our abdominal exploration.</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;</font> <br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Dan<br> <br> -- <br> R. Daniel Braun<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Kinky for Governor </font> <br>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:41:57 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.