Re: Opinions on laparoscopy (long)

From: Andrew Folley (agfolley@hotmail.com)
Tue Sep 27 19:49:43 2005


Its not the bladder. It is the ureter and probably the distal portion 2-4 cm from the right ureteral vesical junction. IVP will demonstate extavasation. Get urology involved. They may be able to reimplant with ureteroneocystotomy. Good luck. andy

>From: "Richard Chudacoff, MD" <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com>
>Reply-To: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@dns.obgyn.net>
>Subject: RE: Opinions on laparoscopy (long)
>Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:00:34 -0500
>
>Agree with the idea that there may have been a bladder injury, although
>with
>almost a liter of fluid when the Foley was placed makes me think it was a
>small laceration. Other option would be a cysto-intestinal fistula. IVP?
>
>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>
>This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and
>may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under
>applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified
>that the dissemination, distribution or copying of the messages is strictly
>prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named
>recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or
>telephone number above and delete this e-mail from your computer.
>
> _____
>
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Larry
>Glazerman
>Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:40 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: RE: Opinions on laparoscopy (long)
>
>I hada similar case once, and it was a bladder laceration with urinary
>ascites. As that gets absorbed, it will bump up the BUN and creatinine. Was
>CT done with IV contrast? Consider cysto/retrograde.
>
>Larry R. Glazerman, MD
>
>Ob-Gyn at Trexlertown, PC
>
>larry.glazerman@lvh.com
>
> _____
>
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Elrod
>Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO
>Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:16 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Opinions on laparoscopy (long)
>
>Last week I operated on a 23 yo G0, young healthy active duty woman. She
>had previously had laparoscopy for pelvic pain where they fulgurated
>endometriosis. By her op pictures, the implants were located in the
>posterior cul de sac across both uterosacral ligaments and between them
>over
>the upper vagina and rectum. There did not appear to be much in the
>anterior cul de sac. Prior to me seeing her, she had also gone through 6
>months of Depo Lupron with add back.
>
>My approach was going to be excision of peritoneal implants rather than
>recauterizing implants.
>
>Surgery was fairly uneventful. I was able to use sharp dissection to peel
>away most of the peritoneum from the posterior culdesac and both ovarian
>fossas. Both ureters were seen before and after the dissection. I had a
>rectal probe in the rectum and a sponge stick in the vagina to be able to
>locate these. Blood loss was about 100ml. I tried not to burn much so I
>left it a bit 'oozy' but by no means actively bleeding.
>
>In PACU her pain wasn't well controlled and she couldn't void. She was
>then
>admitted.
>
>Serial H/H over the next 24hrs were stable. VS initially were stable as
>well. She was able to void 100-200ml at a time. Pain was still an issue
>so
>she stayed.
>
>On POD 2 now, she became hypoxic with desats to the 80s on RA. O2 was
>added
>and she came back up to normal. At the same time she became tachycardic
>with HR to 130s. EKG, CXR and KUB were orderd.
>
>EKG-sinus tach
>
>CXR-right pleural effusion
>
>KUB-dilated large bowel with all bowels apparently pushed to the midline,
>with presumptive diagnosis of ascites.
>
>Days begin to get fuzzy at this point, but over the next several days the
>following happen.
>
>Foley gets put in with 1000ml out, grossly infected and subsequently grows
>out E coli. Cipro started.
>
>BUN/Cr bump to 25/2.5 IVF changed and within a day renal function
>normalizes. Renal ultrasound normal. Ascites confirmed. Pt still is not
>passing flatus nor tolerating any clears.
>
>By POD 5-6 pt begins to diurese well, begins to have some liquid stool but
>still vomiting.
>
>Last night, NG tube placed with 950ml out. Today pt vomits NG out.
>
>CT scan today shows clearance of pleural effusions, large amount of ascites
>but no dilated bowels or signs of abscess. Labs show electrolyte
>disturbances (low K, low phosp, low magnesium) all being replaced.
>
>Pericentesis just done with clear fluid noted. Cell count, gram stain and
>culture all pending.
>
>Can anyone make sense of a plausible cause for this? As I've read some
>things on Endometriosis Zone on obgyn.net it seems all I've done previously
>with simple fulguration of endometriosis isn't really doing anything to
>treat the disease. So I tried to expand my thinking and skills and do a
>more aggressive excision. Now I'm stumped and not sure I did the right
>thing by this patient.
>
>I appreciate the help
>
>Glen
>
>//SIGNED//
>
>D. Glen Elrod, Maj., USAF, MC
>
>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>
>Chief of Obstetrics
>
>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>
>RAF Lakenheath, England
>
>Telephone DSN: 314-226-8130
>
> Comm: +44 (0) 1638 52 8130
>
>Notice of Confidentiality
>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information reflected
>on this e-mail and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure of
>information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132, AFI
>33-219, and PL 93-579"
>This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the
>intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any
>questions pertaining to disclosure should be directed to the privacy
>officer.
>
><< image001.jpg >>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:40:56 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.