Re: Enter the Laborist

From: louis weinstein (louisbweinstein@hotmail.com)
Tue Jul 12 07:52:34 2005


At Sat, 18 Jun 2005, RModugno@aol.com wrote: >
>This is an interesting trend.Any thoughts? Did any of the listers attend
>this talk at ACOG?
>
>Enter the Laborist
>Source: Contemporary OB/GYN Newsline Meeting News

I thank everyone for their interesting responces. It is nice to see one's work being discussed and I need all the HELLP I can get. Lou Weinstein

>
>Louis Weinstein, MD, Professor and Chair of Obstetrics at Thomas Jefferson
>University in Philadelphia, wants to transform obstetrics. Just as overworked
>and frustrated internists gave rise to the hospitalist in the 1990s, Dr.
>Weinstein sees overworked and frustrated obstetricians evolving into laborists.
>"The Laborist is a movement that is starting to catch on," Dr. Weinstein told
> the ACM First Current Issues Update yesterday. "In 2003, I had the only
>article on the subject. Two years later, at least 10 hospitals and chains have
>introduced the position."
>The concept of the Laborist is straightforward, Dr. Weinstein said. He or she
> is a hospital employee hired to staff the delivery room and nothing more.
>Like the hospitalist, who is employed to care for hospital inpatients, or the
>ER physician hired to provide emergency care, the Laborist is employed to care
>for women in labor.
>"Hospitalists have the highest satisfaction and lowest burnout rate among all
> physicians," Dr. Weinstein explained. "They work very focused, very limited
>hours. It's shift work, the same predictable work schedule that has made the
>emergency department a popular choice among so many physicians. Obstetricians
> are poised for the same move."
>The current practice model combines an office practice and a hospital
>practice for most obstetricians. That locks practitioners in an unending cycle of
>hospital rounds, deliveries, surgeries, more rounds, office visits, evening
>rounds, and late night telephone calls.
>"Ob/gyns, it is time to take a look at ourselves and see if we can make it
>better," Dr. Weinstein said. "You are on the treadmill. You never get off
>unless you leave town."
>Younger physicians are avoiding obstetrics, Dr. Weinstein added. The problem
>is not liability but time. They know traditional obstetricians work a
>treadmill. Today's physicians want to work hard and make a difference, he explained,
>but they also want to have a life.
>The Laborist gives them both.
>>From the physician perspective, working for a hospital is very likely a
>financial bonus. Typical annual pay is around $175,000, but with no office
>expenses, that represents a boost for many obstetricians. Work as an employee also
>includes guaranteed vacations, CE time, and benefits.
>>From the hospital side, moving to Laborists is revenue-neutral. It also
>increases physician satisfaction and cost-effectiveness, boosts patient outcomes,
>controls liability costs, and increases patient satisfaction.
>"You are gong to see this movement take off in the next 5 to 10 years," Dr.
>Weinstein predicted. "It will be a tremendous recruitment tool and a
>tremendous quality tool for our profession."
>
>Originally published: May 10, 2005
>
>************************************************************
>
>--

>************************************************************
>Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG
>Marietta, GA
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:49:30 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.