|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Habemus Papam!From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse (el@lisse.NA)Sun Apr 24 06:56:00 2005
Hmm, what are they trying to say here? Because condoms reduce only by 69% we should not use them? So that transmission rate is reduced by 5%? By the way, you can not make me believe that, in this instance (discordant couples) there was a 100% condom usage. Hmmm, that calls for a controlled randomized study on subject with high risk sexual behviour. Ie HIV positive subjects HIV negative volunteers and HIV negative subjects/HIV positive contacts :-)-O (and for youL americans out there, no, I am not serious). el
In message <200504232247.j3NMlqw22164@dns.obgyn.net>, art fougner, md writes:
> Additionally, please see :
> So apparently in this instance 2 + 2 = 69%.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Fri May 2 04:40:24 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.