Re: PMB & Tamoxifen

From: Charlie Chambers (cchamber@gorge.net)
Fri Jan 21 14:25:21 2005


I know that Steve Goldstein has used SIS and a cutoff of a 3mm endometrium with uniformity as a positive prognostic sign. Evidence of asymmetry or thickening, he uses to determine the necessity of a biopsy.

On Jan 21, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Joanne Bulley, MD wrote:

> But ... on Tamoxifen with PMB - you first have to PROVE that there is
> no cancer there and a SIS would not do that. She had to have the
> tissue
> sampling - and no tissue was obtained with office biopsy, so the
> curettage was necessary.
>
> Could you say with a SIS that you were 100% certain that ther was no
> tamoxifen induced endometrial cancer? If not ... then why do it?
>
> In the study you quote "Because none of these patients were clinically
> bleeding" -- it suggests that fluid enhancement would be beneficial for
> the patient without bleeding ... if you were doing any evaluation at
> all.
>
> But this patient was bleeding ... enough to drop her Hct a bit from
> its
> usual spot. (she has Chron's and is always on the border of anemia)
>
> So ... this suggests that the myometrial sonolucencies create the
> false
> positive of the 13mm endometrial stripe? So what ARE those
> sonolucencies
> that are seen by US in the woman on Tamoxifen?
>
> At Thu, 20 Jan 2005, art fougner, md wrote:
>>
>> Joanne
>>
>> this goes back to my suggestion of SIS in the evaluation of abnormal
>> bleeding.
>>
>> Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):447-51. Related Articles, Links
>>
>> Comment in:
>>
>> * Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):717-8.
>> * Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Mar;172(3):1067-8.
>>
>> Click here to read
>> Unusual ultrasonographic appearance of the uterus in patients
>> receiving
>> tamoxifen.
>>
>> Goldstein SR.
>>
>> New York University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and
>> Gynecology, NY.
>>
>> Tamoxifen is widely used as adjunctive therapy for patients with
>> breast
>> cancer and has been suggested as protection against the development of
>> breast cancer in women at risk on the basis of heredity. It is a
>> nonsteroidal estrogen antagonist, but like all antagonists it has some
>> agonistic properties. Its administration should result in atrophic
>> changes in the endometrium, but paradoxically some reports have found
>> hyperplasia and even carcinomas developing prospectively in patients
>> on
>> tamoxifen therapy. Increasingly, endovaginal ultrasonography is being
>> used for endometrial assessment in a wide variety of patients. This
>> report is the first description of an unusual ultrasonographic finding
>> in the uteri of some patients receiving tamoxifen. Initially believed
>> to be endometrial in location, when viewed after fluid instillation
>> (sonohysterogram) the heterogenous bizarre ultrasonographic appearance
>> was actually found to represent small subendometrial sonolucencies in
>> the proximal myometrium. Because none of these patients were
>> clinically
>> bleeding and all had inactive endometria on biopsy, it seems prudent
>> not
>> to overinterpret ultrasonography findings in patients receiving
>> tamoxifen who have not had fluid-enhanced assessment.
>>
>> art
>
> --
> Joanne Bulley, MD
> Keene, NH, USA
>
> "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security,
> deserve neither liberty nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin
>
************************************************************************ ****** Charlie Chambers

--
Hood River, OR  USA
cchamber@alumni.rice.edu

"All good things...come by grace, and grace comes by art, and art does not come easy."

Norman Maclean ************************************************************************ *******





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:45:08 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.