-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Refreshing skills From: ainsron (ainsron@sbcglobal.net) Thu Jan 20 10:12:59 2005 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: ainsron: "Re: OB-GYN-L digest 3595" Previous message: Anna Meenan, MD: "Re: Macrosomia" In reply to: Charlie Chambers: "Re: Refreshing skills" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Refreshing skills" It sounds like the biases are in the medical executive committee. How would they handle the proctoring of a "new" ob/gyn? We had a similar problem when an ophthalmologist in town had a brain tumor removed. There were lots of concerns re whether or not he would be able to operate and function at the same level. His partner, who was the other Ophthalmologist in town proctored him, he didn't have a problem and was chief of staff a couple of years later. Ronald E. Ainsworth -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Charlie Chambers Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:05 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Refreshing skills Sorry for the confusion. My 3 partners are in complete support and have made it clear they will do whatever proctoring and q.a. is necessary. The application went through the credentialing committee with approval, but hit this roadblock at the medical executive committee level. Our group represents all the ob/gyn's in town, but the med exec committee felt that my partners would be to biased to supervise my skills. On Jan 19, 2005, at 3:28 PM, ainsron wrote: > Do you mean the hospital administration or the medical staff? > Generally any > issues regarding proctoring or privileges belongs exclusively to the > medical > staff. If your partners support you and the medical executive > committee of > your hospital supports you, the hospital should not have any veto > power, > except at the level of the hospital board. However, they should not be > vetoing prerogatives of the medical staff regarding those types of > issues. > > Ronald E. Ainsworth > > -----Original Message----- > From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of > Charlie > Chambers > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:14 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > Subject: Refreshing skills > > Was wondering if anyone on the list might have some ideas or > suggestions regarding my practice. I'm looking to return to inpatient > care, ob and gyn surgery as soon as possible after an extended absence > of doing office care and ultrasound. The local hospital is against my > being proctored locally despite the solid support of my 3 partners. > I've contacted the local university and they do not have the capacity > to accommodate me. Does anyone else have any suggestions or resources > that might be helpful in this scenario? > > Thanks > > *********************************************************************** > * > **** > Charlie Chambers > Hood River, OR USA > cchamber@alumni.rice.edu > > "...not because I regard fishing as being so terribly > important but because I suspect that so many of the other > concerns of men are equally unimportant-and not nearly > so much fun." > John Voelker > *********************************************************************** > * > ***** > ************************************************************************ ** Charlie Chambers -- Hood River, OR USA cchamber@alumni. rice. edu "I'm a goin fishin. Yeah, I'm goin fishin And my baby's goin fishin too!" Taj Mahal ************************************************************************ Next message: ainsron: "Re: OB-GYN-L digest 3595" Previous message: Anna Meenan, MD: "Re: Macrosomia" In reply to: Charlie Chambers: "Re: Refreshing skills" Next in thread: DoctorJoe@aol.com: "Re: Refreshing skills"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:02:37 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.