Re: Art and Tom Paine

From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com)
Wed Jan 5 14:21:03 2005


Oh, indeed absolutely to be remembered and revered...I'm a guy who pays homage to John Locke, not Nickolai Lenin. But least doesn't take us to none.

There was a vacuum on the island the boys landed on in Lord of The Flies and a 'govenrment' process developed. Captain Smith formualted a little law - "somewhat different" from what Lenin might have suggested - and most historians attiribute the fledgling English settlement's success to his governmental guidance as much as to anything else. Advice which very directly addressed who gets what and who does what and for whom each primarily did what they did. (Assuming we all agree that what they "did" is what "did" does mean now...uh, smile with me here gang...might be too close to my last elixer APAP/hydrocodone dose.)

Hank

, md" <evsono@pipeline.com> wrote: "That government is best which governs least." -- Thomas Paine

art

At Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Henry Gregor wrote: >
>One doesn't need to discuss surrogate pregnacies to get involved with issues of who should pay for what, for whom. Dangerous territory to explore, and like racism, elitism, reverse discrimination, sexism, ageism, etc. always a topic quick to degrade into emotional, vitriolic, diatribes rather than explorations of issues. Good point to bring up though. If one is going to hold the folks requesting surrogacy services accountable, what then re the costs of multiple birth assisted reproductive pregnancies and their hugh pre and post natal costs, what of the reproductive sociopath male who impregnates a range of partners while standing by few or none of them and their offspring? What of the reproductive sociopath daughter - question asked recently not by me or at my instigation but by her patient-of-mine mother - who has had four boys on welfare medical care, existing on AFDC, now pregnant by a financially non-supportive male, who cares not re the circumstances, as the gravida!
isn't > stopping till she gets her gal? Simply raising these issues is a third rail for public policy officials and yet while we as a nation do not address them, the circumstances continue to occur, and the societal responses vary all over the roadmap, most often to the misfortune of born or yet to be be born children. My understanding of law is that it evovlves in response to societal issues over changing landscapes of time, cultural values, scientifice and social sciences knowledge, etc. Perhaps the issues related to surrogacy law will help develop into consideration of these other areas of concern as well.
>
>Lastly, I remember one of my grandfathers, a veritable prototype of the very intelligent person deprived of an education and therefore almost religiously reverential in his regard for it, commenting to a very very young edition of me, that television - with people like "Mr. Morrow" were going to take society and civilization to a higher level than ever dreamed of, given television's ability to bring so many important issues to so many people previously without resources of knowledge and informed people to discuss things with them and present such topics to huge numbers of intereseted citizens. Boy, I'm not glad JaJa's dead folks, but am glad he's not around to here the likes of all the shouting mouths from all ends of the spectrum who are more interested in providing us the tv journalists' version of http://www wrestling than disinterested and informed issue analysis.
>
>So, without having read the law in question (and most likely being unable to comprehend it astutely if I had, lol), I'm glad the law was passed, as it seems to put something of well intended substance into what was virtually a vacuum. ... and now the usual legal evoluationary process can proceed. I'm not concerned whether such a bill has flaws. All laws carry unintended consequences. Only way for a body politic to produce an unflawed law is to never pass any law.
>
>Hank

--
art fougner, md
May the Joy of this Holiday Season Be with You
and Yours throughout the New Year.

The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do?





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:47:38 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.