Re: When to cut
From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Tue Nov 16 12:13:46 2004
THAT'S THE problem--sorry about that...
>At Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>
>Nursery????? Oh that thing with the warmers???
>
>Glen
>
>D. Glen Elrod, Maj USAF, MC
>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>Maternal Child Flight
>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>UNIT 5210 Box 23
>APO, AE 09464
>DSN (314) 226-8334
>Comm 01638-52-8334
>
>Notice of Confidentiality
>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>reflected on this Email and, if applicable, all attachments. Disclosure
>of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132,
>AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>This document may contain information covered under the Privacy Act, 5
>USC 552(a), and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
>Act (PL 104-191) and its various implementing regulations and must be
>protected in accordance with those provisions. Healthcare information is
>personal and sensitive and must be treated accordingly. See
><https://sg.usafe.af.mil/HIPAADisclosure.cfm> for full details.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain
>Ramirez
>Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:01 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: When to cut
>
>Well--she is "latent phase of labor" -- with 3 prior C/S I would deliver
>her today -- BTW- how is your nursery??
>
>>At Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote:
>>
>>32 yo G4P3 at 37wks with three prior csections, the first was for
>>failure to progress (arrest of dilation) the rest were repeats. Now
>>contracting every 3 minutes, but not showing any cervical change. I
>>hydrated her last week (36wks) for the same and contractions stopped
>and
>>she went home.
>>
>>My question is, with prior sections does the definition of "labor" i.e.
>>regular contractions with cervical change still apply? Is there a
>>gestation that if they are contracting regularly you would section due
>>to potential risk of rupture?
>>
>>I guess I just have a hard time sending someone home that is
>contracting
>>with three prior sections because she is not 'in labor'
>>
>>Glen
>>
>>D. Glen Elrod, Maj USAF, MC
>>
>>Obstetrician/Gynecologist
>>
>>Maternal Child Flight
>>
>>48 MDOS/SGOBO
>>
>>UNIT 5210 Box 23
>>
>>APO, AE 09464
>>
>>DSN (314) 226-8334
>>
>>Comm 01638-52-8334
>>
>>Notice of Confidentiality
>>Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information
>>reflected on this Email and, if applicable, all attachments.
>Disclosure
>>of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, AFI 37-132,
>>AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579"
>>This document may contain information covered under the Privacy Act, 5
>>USC 552(a), and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
>>Act (PL 104-191) and its various implementing regulations and must be
>>protected in accordance with those provisions. Healthcare information
>is
>>personal and sensitive and must be treated accordingly. See
>><https://sg.usafe.af.mil/HIPAADisclosure.cfm> for full details.
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>________________________________
>>________________________________
>>
>>--
>>________________________________
>>
>>________________________________
>>________________________________
>
>--
>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound
>truth."
>
>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>
--
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
|
|
