-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Early glucose screening From: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu) Tue Nov 2 06:28:17 2004 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: Cervical stenosis in the office" Previous message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Lovely Newborn Babies ..." Maybe in reply to: Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Early glucose screening" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Early glucose screening" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Early glucose screening" Do you rescreen the negatives at 28-30 weeks? R. Daniel Braun, MD "If everyone likes you, you're doing something wrong." Kinky Friedman I believe a self-righteous liberal or conservative with a cause is more dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude. Andy Rooney -----Original Message----- From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain Ramirez Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:38 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: Early glucose screening I screen all my patients early in pregnancy (hispanic) 135 cut-off - 3 hr GTT for diagnosis - Coustan curve..good results.. At Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO wrote: > >How is everyone screening for women with risk factors for >pregestational diabetes in early pregnancy (ie obesity, prior GDM, >family history) The technical bulletin states they need to be screened >but doesn't really say what test needs to be ordered. > >My thought is that the ADA criteria for diagnosing diabetes outside of >pregnancy, either fasting glucose or a 2 hr GCT should work. I'm not >sure the 1 hr 50gm glucola is the right test even though it's the one >we are most familiar with. > >Any thoughts? > >Glen > >D. Glen Elrod, Maj USAF, MC >Obstetrician/Gynecologist >Maternal Child Flight > >48 MDOS/SGOBO >UNIT 5210 Box 23 >APO, AE 09464 >DSN (314) 226-8334 >Comm 01638-52-8334 > >Notice of Confidentiality >Under the Privacy Act of 1974, you must safeguard all information >reflected on this Email and, if applicable, all attachments. >Disclosure of information is IAW AFI 33-119, AFI 33-127, AFI 37-131, >AFI 37-132, AFI 33-219, and PL 93-579" This document may contain >information covered under the Privacy Act, 5 USC 552(a), and/or the >Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (PL 104-191) and >its various implementing regulations and must be protected in >accordance with those provisions. Healthcare information is personal >and sensitive and must be treated accordingly. See ><https://sg.usafe.af.mil/HIPAADisclosure.cfm> for full details. -- "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962) Next message: art fougner, md: "Re: Cervical stenosis in the office" Previous message: Braun, R. Daniel: "Re: Lovely Newborn Babies ..." Maybe in reply to: Elrod Darryl G MAJ 48 MDOS/SGOBO: "Early glucose screening" Next in thread: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Early glucose screening" Reply: Efrain Ramirez: "Re: Early glucose screening"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Sep 2 05:02:07 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.