Re: BPP vs.KC
From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Tue Sep 14 18:54:27 2004
We are in an era of zero tolerance meaning now space for any mistakes
that would lead to a bad outcome - sad but true - you are right--
>At Mon, 13 Sep 2004, David Priver, MD wrote:
>
>Agree with Richard, but at my place we use the Cytotec intravag. Works
>well and avoids a lot of the GI side effects. Sorry to hear that your
>hospital doesn't have the fortitude to stand up to this sort of
>intimidation and come down on the side of good medical practice. Isn't
>it sad how much of good quality obstetrics has been disposed of in this
>fashion? Twins, breeches, forceps and just about anything which requires
>skill and judgment. Do they teach residents to do anything besides CS
>nowadays?
>David
>At Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Efrain Ramirez wrote:
>>
>>A law suit and the Searle letter..IMHO it was a mistake.
>>
>>>At Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote:
>>>
>>>A travesty! Why not? Too expensive?
>>>
>>>--
>>>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain
>>>Ramirez
>>>Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 12:33 PM
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>>Subject: Re: BPP vs.KC
>>>
>>>Agree with all of you -- unfortunately, we no longer have Cytotec at our
>>>institution!
>>>
>>>>At Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Richard Chudacoff, MD wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Deliver. Nothing good happens after 40 weeks gestation. Cytotec 100
>>>>micrograms, po, at 3 AM. Rupture at 8 AM, epidural at 9 AM, possibly
>>>>pitocin augmentation at 10 AM, deliver at noon.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Richard Chudacoff, MD
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>>>Efrain Ramirez
>>>>Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 12:56 AM
>>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>>>Subject: BPP vs.KC
>>>>
>>>>Beautiful Kick Count - spot NST - non reactive - rest of BPP ok(Good
>>>>breathing -etc) -- GI 40 weeks 1-2 cms-next step?
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>>>>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
>>>>
>>>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>>>>
>>>--
>>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>>>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
>>>
>>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>>>
>>--
>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
>>
>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>>
--
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."
Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
|
|
