![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: UAE OptionFrom: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)Wed Aug 25 20:26:08 2004
You may wish to tread lightly should your patients wish to preserve fertility with UAE. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy Jay Goldberg, MD a * [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Leonardo Pereira, MD a [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Vincenzo Berghella, MD a [MEDLINE LOOKUP] James Diamond, PhD a [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Emile Dara, MD b [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Piero Seinera, MD c [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Renato Seracchioli, MD d [MEDLINE LOOKUP] Objective The objective of this study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in women with fibromyomata who were treated with uterine artery embolization to the outcomes in women who were treated with laparoscopic myomectomy. Study design We compiled data from 53 pregnancies after uterine artery embolization and 139 pregnancies after laparoscopic myomectomy. We calculated and compared rates for spontaneous abortion, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, small for gestational age, and malpresentation. Results Pregnancies after uterine artery embolization had higher rates of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.4, 27.7) and malpresentation (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.0, 20.5) than did pregnancies after laparoscopic myomectomy. The risks of postpartum hemorrhage (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% CI, 0.6, 71.8) and spontaneous abortion (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.8, 3.9) after uterine artery embolization were similarly higher than the risks after laparoscopic myomectomy; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Pregnancies in women with fibromyomata who were treated by uterine artery embolization, compared with pregnancies after laparoscopic myomectomy, were at increased risk for preterm delivery and malpresentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 Jul;191(1):18-21. art
At Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Garry E. Siegel, M.D. wrote:
>
-- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:37:48 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.