Re: Elective Induction - something goes wrong

From: David Priver, MD (dpriver@aol.com)
Sun Jul 11 18:16:18 2004


To get back to the issue of elective induction, I was intrigued by someone's remark in this long thread that patients have become so insistent upon electively ending a pregnancy for these social and convenience reasons that they will actually change their caregiver if their current one won't go along. Therein lies a good part of the problem: we are so easily intimidated by this threat that many are prepared to abandon what they know in their heart is good medicine so as not to lose a patient. Can anyone imagine accepting a late transfer OB case on this basis? Would anyone really accept a patient at term under the condition that you agree to induce her for these entirely specious reasons? I certainly wouldn't and I'd have no respect for someone that would. Also, the literature is entirely clear that induced labor in a nullip carries a dramatically higher CS rate, so why should anyone want to do that? It would be nice to think that we as a profession could summon up the fortitude to adhere to sound practice and refuse to induce (or section, for that matter) a patient just because she wants it. Aren't our liability premiums high enough?

At Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Braun, R. Daniel wrote: >
>If it is indicated it doesn't cause pain???????????????
>Pain is harm,
>An incision is harm.
>
>"Sound is like water. If you drill one hole in the wall the sound will
>leak right through."
>
>- JAY BRAUN, a band member by love, a soundproofer by necessity.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Efrain
>Ramirez
>Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 3:34 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>Subject: Re: Elective Induction - something goes wrong
>
>I see no "harm" in doing an indicated hysterectomy - maybe we are saying
>the same thing - differenttly.
>
>>At Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Braun, R. Daniel wrote:
>>
>>And a total lack of doing anything. Starting an IV is harmful. Doing a
>>hysterectomy is harmful.
>>
>>The principle should state: Do the least harm possible while doing the
>>most good.
>>
>>Dan
>>
>>"Sound is like water. If you drill one hole in the wall the sound will
>>leak right through."
>>
>>- JAY BRAUN, a band member by love, a soundproofer by necessity.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>Efrain Ramirez
>>Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:56 PM
>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>Subject: Re: Elective Induction - something goes wrong
>>
>>My favorite has been - "Primum non nocere" - whoever wrote it -
>>cheers..
>>
>>It is very difficult to follow that principle - it takes guts, honesty,
>
>>intelligence and a true sense of caring for people..
>>
>>>>At Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Myer Bornstein wrote:
>>>
>>>Another quote about medicine that I remember by Sydenham (of
>>>Sydenham's
>>>Chorea) :" ours is an art that is best learned by its practice and
>its
>>
>>>use."
>>>
>>>--
>>>Myer S. Bornstein, MD, MMM, FACOG, FACPE
>>>
>>> _____
>>>
>>>From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of
>>>DoctorJoe@aol.com
>>>Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:42 AM
>>>To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L
>>>Subject: Re: Elective Induction - something goes wrong
>>>
>>>In a message dated 7/8/04 18:22:48, RModugno@aol.com writes:
>>>
>>>The good news is that she pushed 3 times and baby came out with Apgars
>
>>>of 9/9. Whew! I can relax again.
>>>
>>>Glen
>>>
>>>Exactly! Good for you!
>>>
>>>Just yesterday, a law professor asked me "Medicine's a science, isn't
>>>it?"
>>>
>>>My reply was "Medicine is the artful application of science."
>>>
>>>I think this is evidence of that.
>>>
>>>Joe P.
>>>
>>--
>>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound
>>truth."
>>
>>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>>
>--
>"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
>But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound
>truth."
>
>Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)
>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Sun Nov 2 04:49:17 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.