|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
More MedMalFrom: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)Tue Jun 15 09:30:36 2004
In Today's USA Today - Medical-malpractice battle gets personal Some doctors refuse to treat attorneys By Laura Parker USA TODAY There are 73,084 working lawyers in Texas. Selina Leewright never thought that being married to one would cost her her job. But that's why Leewright, a nurse, was fired last summer by Good Shepherd Medical Center in the East Texas city of Longview. In dismissing her, hospital officials praised her nursing skills as ''fantastic.'' But they told her that because her husband, Marty, worked at a law firm that does medical-malpractice litigation, the hospital could not continue to employ her. ''I was dumbfounded,'' Leewright says. ''They just assumed that my husband does medical malpractice, which he doesn't at all.'' Leewright's firing was a measure of how toxic the battle over medical-malpractice lawsuits has become. Hospital administrators and doctors across the nation, furious over what they see as waves of frivolous lawsuits that have driven up malpractice insurance costs, are striking back against lawyers with hardball tactics that, in some cases, are raising ethical questions. Some doctors are refusing medical treatment to lawyers, their families and their employees except in emergencies. Professional medical societies are trying to silence their peers by discouraging doctors from testifying as expert witnesses on behalf of plaintiffs. And a New Jersey doctor who supported malpractice legislation that his colleagues opposed was ousted from his hospital post. While sharing their peers' anger over malpractice lawsuits, some doctors see such tactics -- particularly the refusal of treatment -- as contrary to the Hippocratic oath, in which new doctors acknowledge ''special obligations to all my fellow human beings.'' But Chris Hawk, a surgeon in Charleston, S.C., says the notion of refusing treatment to malpractice lawyers, their family members and associates not only is justified, it's necessary. ''This idea may be repulsive,'' Hawk says. ''It's hardball. But it's ethical.'' Hawk, 57, says that a doctor's ethical obligation to treat patients applies only to emergency care. ''Physicians are not bound to treat everybody who walks through their door,'' he says. For the rest, see http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20040614/6283359s.htm art
-- art fougner, md ich bin ein New Yorker
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:37:26 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.