![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Cesarean Refusal Results In Murder ChargeFrom: Joanne Bulley, MD (islesannie@yahoo.com)Fri Mar 12 12:16:48 2004
I agree -- I like the comment made by the public defender quotes in the St Loius article: "This is nothing if not a very novel legal theory," Sikora said. "If it prevails, it raises questions about what a mother can or cannot do with respect to the safety of her unborn child. If a doctor says this will be a very difficult pregnancy and you should get complete bed rest for the last three months and the mother doesn't and the baby is stillborn, is she guilty of murder? If she smokes, is it murder? If she doesn't eat right, is it murder?" There were "failures" on several sides. I disagre taht she should be charged with "murder" Is this quite likely part of the anti-choice plan: make these dramatic cases that get a lot of public emotions going -- leading closer and closer to reversing Roe v Wade? I am one who firmly believes the subject of abortion choice firmly belongs between the pregnant woman - and her spiritual counselor - and whatever may be there after death. It is not one of court and seculart jusridiction. I do think this case points out how difficult it is to care for the seriously mentally ill patient - especially when pregnant. I don't think it should go to the courts -- I think each city or county needs to have joint assessment and approach to be as sure as possible that pregnant women don't fall though such cracks where you end up woth no one responsible. I would think that this case points more to that - than that one single person is the direct cause of the still birth. Then to really muddy the waters and look at another potential slippery path: which child is "better off" - the one who is a live - but was in the womb with alcohol, cocaine and who knows what else - or the stillborn one who had the same in utero environment. (should I look for the flame suit in the closet?) Joanne
At Fri, 12 Mar 2004, ainsron wrote:
>
-- Joanne Bulley, MD Keene, NH, USA
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:37:04 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.