Re: GYN: WHI - HRT and Colorectal Cancer

From: Efrain Ramirez (eramirezt@coqui.net)
Thu Mar 4 17:54:03 2004


This WHI thing it's getting out of hands - one of these days an epidemiologist will extract some data that will "prove" that ERT is associated with an increase risk of nightmares of "Freddy vs. Jason" -- and savings up to $100 per year/patient of Charmin due to a decrease in BM's -- uf!!

>At Thu, 4 Mar 2004, art fougner, md wrote:
>
>Estrogen plus Progestin and Colorectal Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
>
>Rowan T. Chlebowski, M.D., Ph.D., Jean Wactawski-Wende, Ph.D., Cheryl
>Ritenbaugh, Ph.D., M.P.H., F. Allan Hubbell, M.D., M.S.P.H., Joao
>Ascensao, M.D., Ph.D., Rebecca J. Rodabough, M.S., Carol A. Rosenberg,
>M.D., Victoria M. Taylor, M.D., M.P.H., Randall Harris, M.D., Ph.D.,
>Chu Chen, Ph.D., Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Ph.D., Emily White, Ph.D.,
>for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
>
>ABSTRACT
>
>Background Although the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of
>estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women identified more overall
>health risks than benefits among women in the hormone group, the use of
>estrogen plus progestin was associated with a significant decrease in
>the risk of colorectal cancer. We analyzed features of the colorectal
>cancers that developed and their relation to the characteristics of the
>participants.
>
>Methods In the WHI trial, 16,608 postmenopausal women who were 50 to 79
>years of age and had an intact uterus were randomly assigned to a
>combination of conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg per day) plus
>medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg per day) or placebo. The main
>outcome measures were the incidence, stages, and types of colorectal
>cancer, as determined by blinded central adjudication.
>
>Results There were 43 invasive colorectal cancers in the hormone group
>and 72 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence
>interval, 0.38 to 0.81; P=0.003). The invasive colorectal cancers in
>the hormone group were similar in histologic features and grade to those
>in the placebo group but with a greater number of positive lymph nodes
>(mean ±SD, 3.2±4.1 vs. 0.8±1.7; P=0.002) and were more advanced
>(regional or metastatic disease, 76.2 percent vs. 48.5 percent;
>P=0.004). In exploratory analyses, women in the hormone group with
>antecedent vaginal bleeding had colorectal cancers with a greater number
>of positive nodes than women in the hormone group who did not have
>vaginal bleeding (3.8±4.3 vs. 0.7±1.5 nodes, P=0.006).
>
>Conclusions Relatively short-term use of estrogen plus progestin was
>associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer. However,
>colorectal cancers in women who took estrogen plus progestin were
>diagnosed at a more advanced stage than those in women who took placebo.
>
>New England Journal of Medicine Volume 350:991-1004 March 4, 2004
>
>art
>
>--
>art fougner, md
>ich bin ein New Yorker
>

--
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth."

Niels Bohr (1885 - 1962)





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Oct 2 04:45:54 2008

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.